Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Fontenot
More Freel and more Scales, give Fontenot some rest and bench Aaron Miles. He is completely useless
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=38838:date=May 20 2009, 10:05 AM:name=sleepyhead)-->QUOTE (sleepyhead @ May 20 2009, 10:05 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->More Freel and more Scales, give Fontenot some rest and bench Aaron Miles. He is completely useless<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Not against lefties, where he should be getting most of his at bats.
@TheBlogfines
Reply
Fontenot still blows. And DeRosa is starting to look pretty good. That's all.
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=44156:date=Jun 14 2009, 10:22 PM:name=Butcher)-->QUOTE (Butcher @ Jun 14 2009, 10:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Fontenot still blows. And DeRosa is starting to look pretty good. That's all.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
.306/.395/.444/.839
.326/.392/.500/.892
June stats, 10 AB difference.
[Image: 2hz4sk2.jpg]
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=44157:date=Jun 14 2009, 10:29 PM:name=Baron)-->QUOTE (Baron @ Jun 14 2009, 10:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=44156:date=Jun 14 2009, 10:22 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Jun 14 2009, 10:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Fontenot still blows. And DeRosa is starting to look pretty good. That's all.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
.306/.395/.444/.839
.326/.392/.500/.892
June stats, 10 AB difference.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
June stats? We're 14 days into the month. How many games is that?
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=44158:date=Jun 14 2009, 11:35 PM:name=Butcher)-->QUOTE (Butcher @ Jun 14 2009, 11:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=44157:date=Jun 14 2009, 10:29 PM:name=Baron)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Baron @ Jun 14 2009, 10:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=44156:date=Jun 14 2009, 10:22 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Jun 14 2009, 10:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Fontenot still blows. And DeRosa is starting to look pretty good. That's all.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
.306/.395/.444/.839
.326/.392/.500/.892
June stats, 10 AB difference.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
June stats? We're 14 days into the month. How many games is that?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Fontenot "still" blows. DeRosa is "starting" to look good. Doesn't that imply you're talking about recent results?
This is not some silly theory that's unsupported and deserves being mocked by photos of Xena.  [Image: ITgoyeg.png]
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=44161:date=Jun 14 2009, 10:38 PM:name=Kid)-->QUOTE (Kid @ Jun 14 2009, 10:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=44158:date=Jun 14 2009, 11:35 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Jun 14 2009, 11:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=44157:date=Jun 14 2009, 10:29 PM:name=Baron)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Baron @ Jun 14 2009, 10:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=44156:date=Jun 14 2009, 10:22 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Jun 14 2009, 10:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Fontenot still blows. And DeRosa is starting to look pretty good. That's all.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
.306/.395/.444/.839
.326/.392/.500/.892
June stats, 10 AB difference.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
June stats? We're 14 days into the month. How many games is that?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Fontenot "still" blows. DeRosa is "starting" to look good. Doesn't that imply you're talking about recent results?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I should've just posted their season stats to date, I guess.

DeRosa's overall stats are looking good, while Fontenot's have yet to look good at any point this season.

Better?
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=44162:date=Jun 14 2009, 11:40 PM:name=Butcher)-->QUOTE (Butcher @ Jun 14 2009, 11:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=44161:date=Jun 14 2009, 10:38 PM:name=Kid)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid @ Jun 14 2009, 10:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=44158:date=Jun 14 2009, 11:35 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Jun 14 2009, 11:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=44157:date=Jun 14 2009, 10:29 PM:name=Baron)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Baron @ Jun 14 2009, 10:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=44156:date=Jun 14 2009, 10:22 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Jun 14 2009, 10:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Fontenot still blows. And DeRosa is starting to look pretty good. That's all.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
.306/.395/.444/.839
.326/.392/.500/.892
June stats, 10 AB difference.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
June stats? We're 14 days into the month. How many games is that?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Fontenot "still" blows. DeRosa is "starting" to look good. Doesn't that imply you're talking about recent results?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I should've just posted their season stats to date, I guess.

DeRosa's overall stats are looking good, while Fontenot's have yet to look good at any point this season.

Better?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Makes more sense, but is now the time to complain? It seems at least possible that Fontenot has turned it around, right? You're talking almost 20% of his at bats this season in June.
This is not some silly theory that's unsupported and deserves being mocked by photos of Xena.  [Image: ITgoyeg.png]
Reply
It's not even a fair comparison. Offensively, they may be similar, but the loss of DeRosa's versatility can't be measured. If they're hitting the exact same, then DeRosa's loss still outweigh's Fontenot's gains.
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=44230:date=Jun 15 2009, 12:19 PM:name=FlyAtTheThigh)-->QUOTE (FlyAtTheThigh @ Jun 15 2009, 12:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->It's not even a fair comparison. Offensively, they may be similar, but the loss of DeRosa's versatility can't be measured. If they're hitting the exact same, then DeRosa's loss still outweigh's Fontenot's gains.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
You're obviously not factoring in handedness.
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=44231:date=Jun 15 2009, 01:22 PM:name=Butcher)-->QUOTE (Butcher @ Jun 15 2009, 01:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=44230:date=Jun 15 2009, 12:19 PM:name=FlyAtTheThigh)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (FlyAtTheThigh @ Jun 15 2009, 12:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->It's not even a fair comparison. Offensively, they may be similar, but the loss of DeRosa's versatility can't be measured. If they're hitting the exact same, then DeRosa's loss still outweigh's Fontenot's gains.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
You're obviously not factoring in handedness.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Damn, you're right. Guess that's why I could never be a major league GM.
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=44231:date=Jun 15 2009, 12:22 PM:name=Butcher)-->QUOTE (Butcher @ Jun 15 2009, 12:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=44230:date=Jun 15 2009, 12:19 PM:name=FlyAtTheThigh)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (FlyAtTheThigh @ Jun 15 2009, 12:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->It's not even a fair comparison. Offensively, they may be similar, but the loss of DeRosa's versatility can't be measured. If they're hitting the exact same, then DeRosa's loss still outweigh's Fontenot's gains.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
You're obviously not factoring in handedness.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->


You guys act as if being left handed or right handed has no bearing. Fontenot does have a higher OPS against RHP than DeRosa does.
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=44234:date=Jun 15 2009, 11:41 AM:name=Scarey)-->QUOTE (Scarey @ Jun 15 2009, 11:41 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=44231:date=Jun 15 2009, 12:22 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Jun 15 2009, 12:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=44230:date=Jun 15 2009, 12:19 PM:name=FlyAtTheThigh)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (FlyAtTheThigh @ Jun 15 2009, 12:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->It's not even a fair comparison. Offensively, they may be similar, but the loss of DeRosa's versatility can't be measured. If they're hitting the exact same, then DeRosa's loss still outweigh's Fontenot's gains.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
You're obviously not factoring in handedness.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->


You guys act as if being left handed or right handed has no bearing. Fontenot does have a higher OPS against RHP than DeRosa does.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Yeah but numbers against righties isn't all that matters. We are AWFUL against lefties this year. Cubs as a team are hitting .243 against lefties this year and have only scored 46 total runs while lefties were pitching, which is dead last in all of baseball.
Reply
And yeah I know we are awful against righties too, I'm just sayin, we have a bunch of lefties that can't even touch lefty pitching on our roster and we don't even have enough righties to be able to sit them all.
Reply
Oh, and if we were doing straight OPS comparison, I think the more appropriate comparison would be Miles and DeRosa when considering the current Cubs team.

But I'm not talking OPS, I'm talking players on the whole...I'd rather have DeRosa than Fontenot right now, though we're still a .500 team with him.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)