Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
An observation regarding Sammy Sosa
#31
<!--quoteo(post=79233:date=Feb 10 2010, 04:10 PM:name=jstraw)-->QUOTE (jstraw @ Feb 10 2010, 04:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79229:date=Feb 10 2010, 03:44 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Feb 10 2010, 03:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79211:date=Feb 10 2010, 01:56 PM:name=jstraw)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jstraw @ Feb 10 2010, 01:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79209:date=Feb 10 2010, 01:50 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Feb 10 2010, 01:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->The BBWA even having any say in who does and does not make the HOF is the problem.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I wish there was sufficient proof to ban the cheaters for life.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

You'd have to start kicking people out then. The steroid era, just like every other era in baseball needs to be compared against itself. The best players of the era deserve to be in there, I don't care if they took PEDs or not. Bonds, Sosa, Clemens, they all belong in the HOF.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

That takes unfair advantage of any player that played clean in the same era.

We'll never see eye to eye. You think the belong in the Hall...I think they should be on the island with Pete Rose and Joe Jackson.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Pete Rose and Jackson should be in the HOF also.

I have to agree with Ruby. The guys he listed were the best of their generation. Are the numbers tainted against other generations...sure, however, in their generation they were the best. Honestly, I am willing to bet that half the league was roiding or doing some kind of performance enhancing drugs in the late 90's.
Reply
#32
<!--quoteo(post=78935:date=Feb 8 2010, 02:53 PM:name=Scarey)-->QUOTE (Scarey @ Feb 8 2010, 02:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=78934:date=Feb 8 2010, 04:48 PM:name=MW4)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MW4 @ Feb 8 2010, 04:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=78930:date=Feb 8 2010, 11:48 AM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Feb 8 2010, 11:48 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <!--quotec-->I think Sammy is the single season homerun king<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
There has never been any doubt in my mind.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I'm with you guys, there's no evidence at all--not a peep from anyone.

If there ever is, I'll re-visit my position, but until then Sammy will be the man. (insert Sammy finger gesture)
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

No evidence at all... besides that failed steroid screening.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
what failed steroid screening? You talking about the 104 named list? it didn't say what he failed. He could have got caught for something else. They was testing for lots of things.
[Image: lou.jpg]
Reply
#33
<!--quoteo(post=79347:date=Feb 11 2010, 06:52 PM:name=Mikey)-->QUOTE (Mikey @ Feb 11 2010, 06:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=78935:date=Feb 8 2010, 02:53 PM:name=Scarey)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Scarey @ Feb 8 2010, 02:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=78934:date=Feb 8 2010, 04:48 PM:name=MW4)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MW4 @ Feb 8 2010, 04:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=78930:date=Feb 8 2010, 11:48 AM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Feb 8 2010, 11:48 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <!--quotec-->I think Sammy is the single season homerun king<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
There has never been any doubt in my mind.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I'm with you guys, there's no evidence at all--not a peep from anyone.

If there ever is, I'll re-visit my position, but until then Sammy will be the man. (insert Sammy finger gesture)
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

No evidence at all... besides that failed steroid screening.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
what failed steroid screening? You talking about the 104 named list? it didn't say what he failed. He could have got caught for something else. They was testing for lots of things.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Do you think Sammy did roids or HGH?
Reply
#34
How can anyone be sure as to who was really the "best" in the steroid era if only some of them were using?
Cubs News and Rumors at Bleacher Nation.
Reply
#35
<!--quoteo(post=79354:date=Feb 11 2010, 07:22 PM:name=Ace)-->QUOTE (Ace @ Feb 11 2010, 07:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->How can anyone be sure as to who was really the "best" in the steroid era if only some of them were using?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Thank you....THANK YOU.
Reply
#36
<!--quoteo(post=79354:date=Feb 11 2010, 07:22 PM:name=Ace)-->QUOTE (Ace @ Feb 11 2010, 07:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->How can anyone be sure as to who was really the "best" in the steroid era if only some of them were using?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
How do we know that everyone wasn't using them?
Reply
#37
<!--quoteo(post=79356:date=Feb 11 2010, 08:27 PM:name=ruby23)-->QUOTE (ruby23 @ Feb 11 2010, 08:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79354:date=Feb 11 2010, 07:22 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Feb 11 2010, 07:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->How can anyone be sure as to who was really the "best" in the steroid era if only some of them were using?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
How do we know that everyone wasn't using them?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I don't need to know to hold to my position. But you DO need to know to hold to yours.
Cubs News and Rumors at Bleacher Nation.
Reply
#38
<!--quoteo(post=79358:date=Feb 11 2010, 07:36 PM:name=Ace)-->QUOTE (Ace @ Feb 11 2010, 07:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79356:date=Feb 11 2010, 08:27 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Feb 11 2010, 08:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79354:date=Feb 11 2010, 07:22 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Feb 11 2010, 07:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->How can anyone be sure as to who was really the "best" in the steroid era if only some of them were using?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
How do we know that everyone wasn't using them?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I don't need to know to hold to my position. But you DO need to know to hold to yours.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
No I don't.
Reply
#39
<!--quoteo(post=79361:date=Feb 11 2010, 08:49 PM:name=ruby23)-->QUOTE (ruby23 @ Feb 11 2010, 08:49 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79358:date=Feb 11 2010, 07:36 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Feb 11 2010, 07:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79356:date=Feb 11 2010, 08:27 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Feb 11 2010, 08:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79354:date=Feb 11 2010, 07:22 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Feb 11 2010, 07:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->How can anyone be sure as to who was really the "best" in the steroid era if only some of them were using?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
How do we know that everyone wasn't using them?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I don't need to know to hold to my position. But you DO need to know to hold to yours.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
No I don't.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
How can anyone be sure as to who was really the "best" in the steroid era if only some of them were using?
Cubs News and Rumors at Bleacher Nation.
Reply
#40
<!--quoteo(post=79347:date=Feb 11 2010, 07:52 PM:name=Mikey)-->QUOTE (Mikey @ Feb 11 2010, 07:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=78935:date=Feb 8 2010, 02:53 PM:name=Scarey)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Scarey @ Feb 8 2010, 02:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=78934:date=Feb 8 2010, 04:48 PM:name=MW4)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MW4 @ Feb 8 2010, 04:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=78930:date=Feb 8 2010, 11:48 AM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Feb 8 2010, 11:48 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <!--quotec-->I think Sammy is the single season homerun king<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
There has never been any doubt in my mind.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I'm with you guys, there's no evidence at all--not a peep from anyone.

If there ever is, I'll re-visit my position, but until then Sammy will be the man. (insert Sammy finger gesture)
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

No evidence at all... besides that failed steroid screening.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
what failed steroid screening? You talking about the 104 named list? it didn't say what he failed. He could have got caught for something else. They was testing for lots of things.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

They tested for performance enhancers, I was just saying roids for dramatic affect. If you want to argue semantics, I really don't care. You win. In the end he cheated, and like many others it broke my heart after I realized what I fool I was to believe otherwise.

Ace said it best. - "Many of my favorite Cubs memories involve Sammy. And they all feel tainted. Which sucks."
Reply
#41
<!--quoteo(post=79362:date=Feb 11 2010, 07:50 PM:name=Ace)-->QUOTE (Ace @ Feb 11 2010, 07:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79361:date=Feb 11 2010, 08:49 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Feb 11 2010, 08:49 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79358:date=Feb 11 2010, 07:36 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Feb 11 2010, 07:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79356:date=Feb 11 2010, 08:27 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Feb 11 2010, 08:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79354:date=Feb 11 2010, 07:22 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Feb 11 2010, 07:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->How can anyone be sure as to who was really the "best" in the steroid era if only some of them were using?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
How do we know that everyone wasn't using them?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I don't need to know to hold to my position. But you DO need to know to hold to yours.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
No I don't.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
How can anyone be sure as to who was really the "best" in the steroid era if only some of them were using?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I can look at the numbers and see who had the best, they would be the best players.
Reply
#42
<!--quoteo(post=79368:date=Feb 11 2010, 09:06 PM:name=ruby23)-->QUOTE (ruby23 @ Feb 11 2010, 09:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79362:date=Feb 11 2010, 07:50 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Feb 11 2010, 07:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79361:date=Feb 11 2010, 08:49 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Feb 11 2010, 08:49 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79358:date=Feb 11 2010, 07:36 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Feb 11 2010, 07:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79356:date=Feb 11 2010, 08:27 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Feb 11 2010, 08:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79354:date=Feb 11 2010, 07:22 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Feb 11 2010, 07:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->How can anyone be sure as to who was really the "best" in the steroid era if only some of them were using?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
How do we know that everyone wasn't using them?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I don't need to know to hold to my position. But you DO need to know to hold to yours.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
No I don't.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
How can anyone be sure as to who was really the "best" in the steroid era if only some of them were using?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I can look at the numbers and see who had the best, they would be the best players.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Ooooh. Oh. Oh. I got it now.

You're crazy.
Cubs News and Rumors at Bleacher Nation.
Reply
#43
<!--quoteo(post=79370:date=Feb 11 2010, 08:08 PM:name=Ace)-->QUOTE (Ace @ Feb 11 2010, 08:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79368:date=Feb 11 2010, 09:06 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Feb 11 2010, 09:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79362:date=Feb 11 2010, 07:50 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Feb 11 2010, 07:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79361:date=Feb 11 2010, 08:49 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Feb 11 2010, 08:49 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79358:date=Feb 11 2010, 07:36 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Feb 11 2010, 07:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79356:date=Feb 11 2010, 08:27 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Feb 11 2010, 08:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79354:date=Feb 11 2010, 07:22 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Feb 11 2010, 07:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->How can anyone be sure as to who was really the "best" in the steroid era if only some of them were using?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
How do we know that everyone wasn't using them?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I don't need to know to hold to my position. But you DO need to know to hold to yours.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
No I don't.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
How can anyone be sure as to who was really the "best" in the steroid era if only some of them were using?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I can look at the numbers and see who had the best, they would be the best players.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Ooooh. Oh. Oh. I got it now.

You're crazy.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yeah, crazy awesome.
Reply
#44
<!--quoteo(post=79371:date=Feb 11 2010, 09:12 PM:name=ruby23)-->QUOTE (ruby23 @ Feb 11 2010, 09:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79370:date=Feb 11 2010, 08:08 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Feb 11 2010, 08:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79368:date=Feb 11 2010, 09:06 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Feb 11 2010, 09:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79362:date=Feb 11 2010, 07:50 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Feb 11 2010, 07:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79361:date=Feb 11 2010, 08:49 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Feb 11 2010, 08:49 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79358:date=Feb 11 2010, 07:36 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Feb 11 2010, 07:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79356:date=Feb 11 2010, 08:27 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Feb 11 2010, 08:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79354:date=Feb 11 2010, 07:22 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Feb 11 2010, 07:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->How can anyone be sure as to who was really the "best" in the steroid era if only some of them were using?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
How do we know that everyone wasn't using them?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I don't need to know to hold to my position. But you DO need to know to hold to yours.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
No I don't.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
How can anyone be sure as to who was really the "best" in the steroid era if only some of them were using?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I can look at the numbers and see who had the best, they would be the best players.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Ooooh. Oh. Oh. I got it now.

You're crazy.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yeah, crazy awesome.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I can't believe I ever used to dislike you and/or be afraid of you.
Cubs News and Rumors at Bleacher Nation.
Reply
#45
<!--quoteo(post=79368:date=Feb 11 2010, 08:06 PM:name=ruby23)-->QUOTE (ruby23 @ Feb 11 2010, 08:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79362:date=Feb 11 2010, 07:50 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Feb 11 2010, 07:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79361:date=Feb 11 2010, 08:49 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Feb 11 2010, 08:49 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79358:date=Feb 11 2010, 07:36 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Feb 11 2010, 07:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79356:date=Feb 11 2010, 08:27 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Feb 11 2010, 08:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=79354:date=Feb 11 2010, 07:22 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Feb 11 2010, 07:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->How can anyone be sure as to who was really the "best" in the steroid era if only some of them were using?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
How do we know that everyone wasn't using them?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I don't need to know to hold to my position. But you DO need to know to hold to yours.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
No I don't.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
How can anyone be sure as to who was really the "best" in the steroid era if only some of them were using?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I can look at the numbers and see who had the best, they would be the best players.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->


The writing students that plagiarize are the best writers...I can tell by looking at their grades!
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 10 Guest(s)