Command versus Control

[Destined]

<!--quoteo(post=90303:date=Apr 17 2010, 07:15 AM:name=Fella)-->QUOTE (Fella @ Apr 17 2010, 07:15 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=90293:date=Apr 17 2010, 06:33 AM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Apr 17 2010, 06:33 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=90251:date=Apr 16 2010, 11:14 PM:name=jstraw)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jstraw @ Apr 16 2010, 11:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=90246:date=Apr 16 2010, 09:59 PM:name=Brock)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brock @ Apr 16 2010, 09:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=90239:date=Apr 16 2010, 09:39 PM:name=jstraw)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jstraw @ Apr 16 2010, 09:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Len read this very question from viewer email to Bob in the booth the other day.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Are you calling Ace a plagiarist?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

No. Plagiarism would be regurgitating Bob's answer.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Just curious: what was Bob's answer?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
He said he thought they were interchangeable words that pretty much meant the same thing. No joke.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I remember during ST that they were talking about this, and Len gave Ace's argument and BB agreed.

[bz]

<!--quoteo(post=90436:date=Apr 17 2010, 02:48 PM:name=Destined)-->QUOTE (Destined @ Apr 17 2010, 02:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=90303:date=Apr 17 2010, 07:15 AM:name=Fella)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Fella @ Apr 17 2010, 07:15 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=90293:date=Apr 17 2010, 06:33 AM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Apr 17 2010, 06:33 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=90251:date=Apr 16 2010, 11:14 PM:name=jstraw)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jstraw @ Apr 16 2010, 11:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=90246:date=Apr 16 2010, 09:59 PM:name=Brock)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brock @ Apr 16 2010, 09:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=90239:date=Apr 16 2010, 09:39 PM:name=jstraw)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jstraw @ Apr 16 2010, 09:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Len read this very question from viewer email to Bob in the booth the other day.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Are you calling Ace a plagiarist?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

No. Plagiarism would be regurgitating Bob's answer.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Just curious: what was Bob's answer?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
He said he thought they were interchangeable words that pretty much meant the same thing. No joke.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I remember during ST that they were talking about this, and Len gave Ace's argument and BB agreed.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Probably because he didn't give a shit.

[funkster]

<!--quoteo(post=90448:date=Apr 17 2010, 03:07 PM:name=bz)-->QUOTE (bz @ Apr 17 2010, 03:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=90436:date=Apr 17 2010, 02:48 PM:name=Destined)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Destined @ Apr 17 2010, 02:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=90303:date=Apr 17 2010, 07:15 AM:name=Fella)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Fella @ Apr 17 2010, 07:15 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=90293:date=Apr 17 2010, 06:33 AM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Apr 17 2010, 06:33 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=90251:date=Apr 16 2010, 11:14 PM:name=jstraw)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jstraw @ Apr 16 2010, 11:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=90246:date=Apr 16 2010, 09:59 PM:name=Brock)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brock @ Apr 16 2010, 09:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=90239:date=Apr 16 2010, 09:39 PM:name=jstraw)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jstraw @ Apr 16 2010, 09:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Len read this very question from viewer email to Bob in the booth the other day.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Are you calling Ace a plagiarist?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

No. Plagiarism would be regurgitating Bob's answer.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Just curious: what was Bob's answer?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
He said he thought they were interchangeable words that pretty much meant the same thing. No joke.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I remember during ST that they were talking about this, and Len gave Ace's argument and BB agreed.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Probably because he didn't give a shit.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif[/img] Seems plausible.

[kbwsb]

Curt Schilling was once talking about a game he pitched (I think on his blog) and he defined it similarly to what Ace and BT said: control is throwing strikes (throwing the ball over the plate), command is a bit more about pitching to <i>specific parts of the plate</i>.

In fact, he talked about being wanting to pitch to, say, the upper right quadrant of the plate when A-Rod had a 2-1 count on him, and he said that the difference between him pitching well or poorly depended upon whether he could hit those spots.