Poll: American League West
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Angels
46.88%
15 46.88%
Rangers
21.88%
7 21.88%
A's
0%
0 0%
Mariners
31.25%
10 31.25%
Total 32 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
American League Division Winner Predictions
#1
Who you got facing the Cubs in the World Series?
"Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that." - George Carlin 



"That was some of the saddest stuff I've ever read. Fuck cancer and AIDS, ignorance is the scourge of the land." - tom v

 
Reply
#2
Halos. Twinkies. Rays.
I hate my pretentious sounding username too.
Reply
#3
<!--quoteo(post=85741:date=Apr 3 2010, 10:17 PM:name=Destined)-->QUOTE (Destined @ Apr 3 2010, 10:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Halos. Twinkies. Rays.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I think they all finish in 3rd place.
@TheBlogfines
Reply
#4
<!--quoteo(post=85744:date=Apr 3 2010, 09:21 PM:name=Clapp)-->QUOTE (Clapp @ Apr 3 2010, 09:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=85741:date=Apr 3 2010, 10:17 PM:name=Destined)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Destined @ Apr 3 2010, 10:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Halos. Twinkies. Rays.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I think they all finish in 3rd place.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
All three divisions have three legitimate contenders, and two pieces of shit. (Sans the Four-Team AL West. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif[/img] )
I hate my pretentious sounding username too.
Reply
#5
Ranger/Twins/Rays

Although all three divisions are going to be competitive at the top
Reply
#6
Yankees: Defending champs makes it hard for me to pick against them, and I didn't love the Sox offseason (though I don't think it was horrible.)

Twins: I really think the AL Central is a crapshoot. Didn't really understand the Tigers offseason and the White Sox don't impress me.

Mariners: Liked their offseason moves. Lee and King Felix have the potential to be the best 1-2 tandem in the game. Angels will probably do what they usually do and find their way to another division crown.

Wild Card: Red Sox
"Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that." - George Carlin 



"That was some of the saddest stuff I've ever read. Fuck cancer and AIDS, ignorance is the scourge of the land." - tom v

 
Reply
#7
I think the Mariners will be a huge disappointment. I don't think Lee will be as out-of-this-world as people claim. They got Bedard a few years back, and he was never the same. Lee is hurt at the moment, Bradley shows no sign of rehabilitation, and that lineup is devoid of power.

I hate my pretentious sounding username too.
Reply
#8
I just don't see how people can pick the Rays ahead of the Red Sox and Yankees. They finished 19 games behind the Yankees last year and 11 behind the Red Sox. They really didn't do anything to improve the team on paper. They're going to have to improve within, which they're certainly capable of with all of their young talent. B.J. Upton can't be any worse and David Price is sure to dominate soon. But, it's gonna be tough.

The Red Sox added John Lackey to a rotation that already has Beckett and Lester. Their defense should also be much improved, their bench is improved, and they have a full season of Victor Martinez's bat.

The Yankees' lineup isn't going to get any worse with Curtis Granderson and Nick Johnson now a part of it. They also have Javier Vazquez now in the rotation. He had a 2.87 ERA and 1.03 WHIP last year and has thrown at least 200 innings in 9 of the last 10 seasons.
@TheBlogfines
Reply
#9
<!--quoteo(post=85752:date=Apr 3 2010, 10:53 PM:name=Destined)-->QUOTE (Destined @ Apr 3 2010, 10:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I think the Mariners will be a huge disappointment. I don't think Lee will be as out-of-this-world as people claim. <b>They got Bedard a few years back, and he was never the same.</b> Lee is hurt at the moment, Bradley shows no sign of rehabilitation, and that lineup is devoid of power.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Bedard's a huge pussy; Cliff Lee isn't.

Their offense is a huge question mark, but should be improved. Ichiro and Figgins at the top of the order will annoy the shit out of pitchers.

Their rotation led the AL in ERA, BAA, OPS allowed, and were 2nd in quality starts last year. Now add Lee into that, and they can really be something. They should especially be good at home where it's tough to score runs anyway. Teams aren't going to put over 3 runs on the board when they're facing Felix and Lee there.

I like them to win the division, but could also see either the Rangers or Angels winning it. Even Baseball Prospectus' projected standings crap have the A's winning it. This will be a really fun division.
@TheBlogfines
Reply
#10
I don't understand what people see in the Tigers. They were a mess last season, and I don't see how they improved at all.
Reply
#11
<!--quoteo(post=85784:date=Apr 4 2010, 01:25 PM:name=rok)-->QUOTE (rok @ Apr 4 2010, 01:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I don't understand what people see in the Tigers. They were a mess last season, and I don't see how they improved at all.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I like them a lot actually and think they win the division. They finished just 1 game out of 1st last year and 6.5 games ahead of the White Sox. They won't lose anything offensively in the Damon-Granderson change, added Valverde at closer, and have a very good 1-2 in Verlander and Porcello(just turned 21, 3.96 ERA last year, and has really opened eyes this spring).

I -loved- the trade with the D'backs. I think Scherzer's better than Edwin Jackson and they also added two other very good young arms in the trade. Then on offense, rookies Austin Jackson and Scott Sizemore are each two of the leading ROY candidates in the AL this year. Jackson's still a project, but Sizemore is expected to step right in and put up solid offensive numbers with 15+ homer ability immediately.

The Twins had the biggest homefield advantage in baseball while playing in the Metrodome, and the White Sox have a very good rotation but it remains to be seen how their different lineup will perform. All three of these teams can win the division
@TheBlogfines
Reply
#12
<!--quoteo(post=85753:date=Apr 3 2010, 11:54 PM:name=Clapp)-->QUOTE (Clapp @ Apr 3 2010, 11:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I just don't see how people can pick the Rays ahead of the Red Sox and Yankees.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I picked the Rays because I think they're a good young team that plays fearlessly.
By contrast, the Yanks are a very old team. I don't think guys like A-Rod and Jeter are going to fall off a cliff this year, but they're at the age when MVP-type seasons become an extreme rarity. Their pitching staff avoided injury problems last year, but guys like AJ are accidents waiting to happen.

The Red Sox will have excellent run prevention. But I'm not sold on a lineup that depends on Big Papi, and that axed Jason Bay. What they're doing is kind of an experiment; I'm pretty interested to see how it turns out. Let's face it, this division could go many ways.

But, the Rays are full of guys in their mid-20's, who should be coming into their primes. Carl Crawford and Carlos Pena are in contract years, so I don't expect them to drop off from their stellar seasons last year.
Also, last year, the Rays had 2 starting OFers and a DH who ALL put up an OPS+ of 79.
Read that again.
I can't imagine something that outrageous will happen this year.

I know they finished pretty far back in '09, but the previous year, they improved by 31 games (66 wins to 97 !), so I don't see a 95-win season as a big stretch.

Then again, maybe I'm picking with my heart.
There's nothing better than to realize that the good things about youth don't end with youth itself. It's a matter of realizing that life can be renewed every day you get out of bed without baggage. It's tough to get there, but it's better than the dark thoughts. -Lance
Reply
#13
<!--quoteo(post=85808:date=Apr 4 2010, 03:07 PM:name=KBwsb)-->QUOTE (KBwsb @ Apr 4 2010, 03:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=85753:date=Apr 3 2010, 11:54 PM:name=Clapp)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Clapp @ Apr 3 2010, 11:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I just don't see how people can pick the Rays ahead of the Red Sox and Yankees.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I picked the Rays because I think they're a good young team that plays fearlessly.
By contrast, the Yanks are a very old team. I don't think guys like A-Rod and Jeter are going to fall off a cliff this year, but they're at the age when MVP-type seasons become an extreme rarity. Their pitching staff avoided injury problems last year, but guys like AJ are accidents waiting to happen.

The Red Sox will have excellent run prevention. But I'm not sold on a lineup that depends on Big Papi, and that axed Jason Bay. What they're doing is kind of an experiment; I'm pretty interested to see how it turns out. Let's face it, this division could go many ways.

But, the Rays are full of guys in their mid-20's, who should be coming into their primes. Carl Crawford and Carlos Pena are in contract years, so I don't expect them to drop off from their stellar seasons last year.
Also, last year, the Rays had 2 starting OFers and a DH who ALL put up an OPS+ of 79.
Read that again.
I can't imagine something that outrageous will happen this year.

I know they finished pretty far back in '09, but the previous year, they improved by 31 games (66 wins to 97 !), so I don't see a 95-win season as a big stretch.

Then again, maybe I'm picking with my heart.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
You make great points and I totally agree that the Rays are capable of it, I just think the Red Sox and Yankees are much more of a sure thing. If we're going purely by talent and depth across the board, you might not find a better choice than the Rays in all of baseball.
@TheBlogfines
Reply
#14
Angels/Twins/Yankees

I think the Central will be tight, but as someone else said, despite their propaganda machine I don't think the the Sox are all that impressive.
Reply
#15
LA Times today....

LAA
TEX
SEA
OAK

DET
MIN
CHW
CLE
KC

TB
BOS
NYY
BAL
TOR
Fat Bastard is an immensely obese, hardly able to walk (weighing a metric ton) gardener and henchman hailing from Scotland. His extreme size endows Fat Bastard with super-human strength as exhibited by his prowess in the Sumo ring from Goldmember. This makes him a formidable enemy for Austin Powers. Fat Bastard is noted for his foul temper, his frequent flatulence, his vulgar and revolting bad manners and his unusual eating habits, which include taste for Human infants (which he calls "the other other white meat") or anything that looks like a baby, e.g. small people. Fat Bastard has been a regular at Cub games since the early 80's when he tried several times (unsuccessfully) to eat the visiting San Diego Chicken.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)