01-14-2009, 01:43 AM
<!--quoteo(post=11438:date=Jan 13 2009, 10:07 PM:name=Gad)-->QUOTE (Gad @ Jan 13 2009, 10:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=11401:date=Jan 13 2009, 07:29 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Jan 13 2009, 07:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=11400:date=Jan 13 2009, 09:15 PM:name=rok)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (rok @ Jan 13 2009, 09:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=11389:date=Jan 13 2009, 07:31 PM:name=Captain)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Captain @ Jan 13 2009, 07:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=11315:date=Jan 13 2009, 01:50 PM:name=Gad)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Gad @ Jan 13 2009, 01:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=11290:date=Jan 13 2009, 12:13 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Jan 13 2009, 12:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->At least this probably takes the Braves out of the Peavy sweepstakes...if they were ever truly in it.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I don't believe the new Padres ownership group intends to deal Peavy anyway.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
From what I read today,they wont take over until Feb. 2010 so I'm not giving up my small glimmer of hope that a deal can get done once the Cubs ownership gets settled.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That sounds about right. All these predictions of SD transferring ownership in 3 months are loony at best.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Moorad's group is expected to have influence in personnel decisions by mid-season, but not sooner.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yes but the entire reason the current owner wanted to cut payroll and thus deal Peavy was due to financial obligations stemming from a messy divorce. That all goes away with him now standing to make hundreds of millions on the sale of the team.
Obviously there is always a chance but it's far less likely he gets dealt now.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Less likely, sure, but ask Peavy if he wants to wait around for the rebuilding process to bear fruit. They aren't close to winning, not now or in the next couple seasons unless the front office cleans house and restocks the farm system. It's really difficult to tell a player that he is going to be dealt, get 90% into a rebuilding process, change course again, and then act as though the front office is going to turn things around like they once were and maintain a competitive payroll. Keeping Peavy around, whether the new owner can afford to or not, doesn't help their bottom line or convince the fans that it's a good investment to buy season tickets. It would make very little sense to hold onto him now as a token gesture. They need to finish what they started.
I don't believe the new Padres ownership group intends to deal Peavy anyway.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
From what I read today,they wont take over until Feb. 2010 so I'm not giving up my small glimmer of hope that a deal can get done once the Cubs ownership gets settled.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That sounds about right. All these predictions of SD transferring ownership in 3 months are loony at best.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Moorad's group is expected to have influence in personnel decisions by mid-season, but not sooner.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yes but the entire reason the current owner wanted to cut payroll and thus deal Peavy was due to financial obligations stemming from a messy divorce. That all goes away with him now standing to make hundreds of millions on the sale of the team.
Obviously there is always a chance but it's far less likely he gets dealt now.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Less likely, sure, but ask Peavy if he wants to wait around for the rebuilding process to bear fruit. They aren't close to winning, not now or in the next couple seasons unless the front office cleans house and restocks the farm system. It's really difficult to tell a player that he is going to be dealt, get 90% into a rebuilding process, change course again, and then act as though the front office is going to turn things around like they once were and maintain a competitive payroll. Keeping Peavy around, whether the new owner can afford to or not, doesn't help their bottom line or convince the fans that it's a good investment to buy season tickets. It would make very little sense to hold onto him now as a token gesture. They need to finish what they started.