Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Watchmen lawsuit settled
#1
<!--quoteo-->QUOTE <!--quotec-->Rival studios reach deal on 'Watchmen' release

LOS ANGELES – The superhero film "Watchmen" will be watched by audiences after all — and on time.

Warner Bros. and 20th Century Fox settled their nearly yearlong dispute over the movie on Thursday, the studios announced in a joint statement.

The movie will open in theaters as planned on March 6, the statement said. The exact terms of the agreement were not disclosed and will remain confidential.

The release date had been in doubt for months as each studio's attorneys grappled for an upper hand. Fox contended that Warner Bros. shot the film knowing that it didn't have all the adequate rights; Warner Bros. countered that Fox had lost its rights in the graphic novel and was owed nothing more than a right of first refusal.

At stake was a movie that has stoked the excitement of "Watchmen" fans and that Warner Bros. claims cost it $150 million to film and market.

Until recently, the studios appeared to be in a stalemate as protracted as the Cold War backdrop of the film's source material. But a Christmas Eve ruling by U.S. District Judge Gary Allen Feess found that Fox did have at least a distribution stake in the film.

Within days of that ruling, Warner Bros. and Fox were in serious settlement negotiations.

Attorneys were scheduled to update Feess on the settlement Friday morning.

While the studios agreed on little throughout the case, the statement released Thursday sought to end months of acrimony.

"Warner Bros. and Fox, like all 'Watchmen' fans, look forward with great anticipation to this film's March 6 release in theaters," the statement said.

Fox is owned by News Corp.; Warner Bros. is a unit of Time Warner Inc.

As part of the agreement, both sides acknowledged the others were acting in "good faith," although Warner Bros. conceded Fox notified it of its rights before filming began.

Fox acquired movie rights to "Watchmen," a graphic novel by Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons, in the 1980s.

The project has had a tortured course to the big screen, with Warner Bros. having to resolve issues with other studios that had considered making the film.

The various agreements led Feess to declare during one hearing that the case was "very complex, convoluted."

The same could be said for "Watchmen," which features a complex story line set in an alternate-history United States and characters with names such as Rorschach and Ozymandias.

"Watchmen" has generated considerable buzz, in part because of the threat that the film's release would be delayed or blocked. But the attention is also because its director, Zack Snyder, helped turn another graphic novel, "300," into a blockbuster.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
[Image: lou.jpg]
Reply
#2
This movie is going to suck.
Reply
#3
<!--quoteo(post=12234:date=Jan 18 2009, 01:01 PM:name=Brock)-->QUOTE (Brock @ Jan 18 2009, 01:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->This movie is going to suck.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Considering the source material is arguably the greatest graphic novel of all time, they'd have try really hard to fuck it up.
Reply
#4
Considering how long this project has been in the works in one form or another, with multiple directors and that several studios have wrestled with how to translate the story well onto the screen, it isn't a slam dunk that this movie will be great. I'm really looking forward to it, but my excitement is tempered.
Reply
#5
It's got a lot going against it. I read that the author wants nothing to do with the project - surely that isn't a good sign. Along with all the delays and the fact that it's directed by the guy who did 300 (ugh), I'm thinking this one is going to be a real stinker.
Reply
#6
<!--quoteo(post=12416:date=Jan 19 2009, 12:44 PM:name=Brock)-->QUOTE (Brock @ Jan 19 2009, 12:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->It's got a lot going against it. I read that the author wants nothing to do with the project - surely that isn't a good sign. Along with all the delays and the fact that it's directed by the guy who did 300 (ugh), I'm thinking this one is going to be a real stinker.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Well, let's hope it is more like Dawn of the Dead than 300.
Reply
#7
<!--quoteo(post=12410:date=Jan 19 2009, 11:48 AM:name=Dirk)-->QUOTE (Dirk @ Jan 19 2009, 11:48 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=12234:date=Jan 18 2009, 01:01 PM:name=Brock)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brock @ Jan 18 2009, 01:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->This movie is going to suck.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Considering the source material is arguably the greatest graphic novel of all time, they'd have try really hard to fuck it up.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm not sure what that has to do with anything. Bonfire of the Vanities was an incredibly awesome book -- and the filmmakers had a lot of talent on board for the film adaptation. And they made an absolute train wreck of a movie.

I'd say it's pretty easy to fuck up great source material.
Reply
#8
Yeah, Butch, it would be very easy to fuck this up.

I don't see this movie living up to the source material just because it is so hard to do the GN justice in 3 hours. My hope is that it will be a V for Vendetta kind of adaptation and be a nice companion piece to the material.
"Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that." - George Carlin 



"That was some of the saddest stuff I've ever read. Fuck cancer and AIDS, ignorance is the scourge of the land." - tom v

 
Reply
#9
I was less than impressed with V For Vendetta. It wasn't terrible, but it could have been a LOT better IMO.
Reply
#10
<!--quoteo(post=12446:date=Jan 19 2009, 05:44 PM:name=rok)-->QUOTE (rok @ Jan 19 2009, 05:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I was less than impressed with V For Vendetta. It wasn't terrible, but it could have been a LOT better IMO.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

while this is true, i'm not familiar with the source material, so maybe it was a little bit better for me. i thought it could have been better but still really liked it.
Life is a bitch, but she's totally doable.
Reply
#11
<!--quoteo(post=12455:date=Jan 19 2009, 07:27 PM:name=liner)-->QUOTE (liner @ Jan 19 2009, 07:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=12446:date=Jan 19 2009, 05:44 PM:name=rok)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (rok @ Jan 19 2009, 05:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I was less than impressed with V For Vendetta. It wasn't terrible, but it could have been a LOT better IMO.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

while this is true, i'm not familiar with the source material, so maybe it was a little bit better for me. i thought it could have been better but still really liked it.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Oh, yeah, I totally agree. V for Vendetta wasn't the end all be all, but it is hands down the best adaptation of any of Moore's work. V for Vendetta is the ceiling, if you will, that I hold for Watchmen. It is definitely not going to touch the source, but if it gets a 'V' treatment I'll be happy. Now if it stoops down to 'League of Extraordinary Gentlemen' territory, then we will have a problem.

There's a reason Alan Moore hates Hollywood and hates his work being adapted...they cut out the heart and chuck it away to make a quick buck.
"Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that." - George Carlin 



"That was some of the saddest stuff I've ever read. Fuck cancer and AIDS, ignorance is the scourge of the land." - tom v

 
Reply
#12
I know nothing of the comic or whatver but there appears to be some dude who looks like ol school batman and that is gay.
If Angelo had picked McClellin, I would have been expecting to hear by training camp that kid has stage 4 cancer, is actually 5'2" 142 lbs, is a chick who played in a 7 - 0 defensive scheme who only rotated in on downs which were 3 and 34 yds + so is not expecting to play a down in the NFL until the sex change is complete and she puts on another 100 lbs. + but this is Emery's first pick so he'll get a pass with a bit of questioning. - 1060Ivy
Reply
#13
<!--quoteo(post=12493:date=Jan 20 2009, 03:23 AM:name=bz)-->QUOTE (bz @ Jan 20 2009, 03:23 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I know nothing of the comic or whatver but there appears to be some dude who looks like ol school batman and that is gay.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif[/img]
"I'm not sure I know what ball cheese or crotch rot is, exactly -- or if there is a difference between the two. Don't post photos, please..."

- Butcher
Reply
#14
I've read the novel and I don't know how well it's going to translate to film. It didn't strike me as a movie when I was reading it.
Reply
#15
What's the difference between a graphic novel and a comic book?

Don't bother telling me the similarities - I already know they're both read by dudes with no girlfriend.
Cubs News and Rumors at Bleacher Nation.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)