Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Aramis wants to be a Cub for life
#31
As long as David Wright is in the NL, Aram should not be winning gold gloves.
Reply
#32
<!--quoteo(post=22352:date=Mar 7 2009, 08:38 AM:name=Coldneck)-->QUOTE (Coldneck @ Mar 7 2009, 08:38 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->As long as David Wright is in the NL, Aram should not be winning gold gloves.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Because of that thinking Aramis got screwed of a gold glove in 2007.

10 errors, .972 fielding percentage

21 errors, .954 fielding percentage

Chipper Jones even said how ridiculous it was that Wright won and that it should've been Aramis.
@TheBlogfines
Reply
#33
I agree that Gold Gloves are not a hard and fast measure of a fielder's prowess, but if by the age of 28, one guy has won 5 of them, and at the age of 30 the other guy hasn't won any, it's pretty safe to say that the 5GG guy is likely an elite fielder, and the other guy isn't.
There's nothing better than to realize that the good things about youth don't end with youth itself. It's a matter of realizing that life can be renewed every day you get out of bed without baggage. It's tough to get there, but it's better than the dark thoughts. -Lance
Reply
#34
<!--quoteo(post=22352:date=Mar 7 2009, 10:38 AM:name=Coldneck)-->QUOTE (Coldneck @ Mar 7 2009, 10:38 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->As long as David Wright is in the NL, Aram should not be winning gold gloves.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Why do people think Wright is a great fielder?
"I'm not sure I know what ball cheese or crotch rot is, exactly -- or if there is a difference between the two. Don't post photos, please..."

- Butcher
Reply
#35
<!--quoteo(post=22453:date=Mar 8 2009, 04:26 PM:name=PcB)-->QUOTE (PcB @ Mar 8 2009, 04:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=22352:date=Mar 7 2009, 10:38 AM:name=Coldneck)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Coldneck @ Mar 7 2009, 10:38 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->As long as David Wright is in the NL, Aram should not be winning gold gloves.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Why do people think Wright is a great fielder?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I think he's a great fielder because every time I see him play he is amazing. I had no ideas what his numbers look like, i've just seen him play extraordinary defense.
Reply
#36
<!--quoteo(post=22453:date=Mar 8 2009, 04:26 PM:name=PcB)-->QUOTE (PcB @ Mar 8 2009, 04:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=22352:date=Mar 7 2009, 10:38 AM:name=Coldneck)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Coldneck @ Mar 7 2009, 10:38 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->As long as David Wright is in the NL, Aram should not be winning gold gloves.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Why do people think Wright is a great fielder?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Because he caught that one ball bare-handed when a glove catch was equally possible.
Cubs News and Rumors at Bleacher Nation.
Reply
#37
<!--quoteo(post=22455:date=Mar 8 2009, 03:55 PM:name=Ace)-->QUOTE (Ace @ Mar 8 2009, 03:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=22453:date=Mar 8 2009, 04:26 PM:name=PcB)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (PcB @ Mar 8 2009, 04:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=22352:date=Mar 7 2009, 10:38 AM:name=Coldneck)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Coldneck @ Mar 7 2009, 10:38 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->As long as David Wright is in the NL, Aram should not be winning gold gloves.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Why do people think Wright is a great fielder?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Because he caught that one ball bare-handed when a glove catch was equally possible.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That's actually what I was thinking. Ok as long as I know I'm not the only one that knows the truth.
"I'm not sure I know what ball cheese or crotch rot is, exactly -- or if there is a difference between the two. Don't post photos, please..."

- Butcher
Reply
#38
<!--quoteo(post=22390:date=Mar 7 2009, 05:16 PM:name=KBwsb)-->QUOTE (KBwsb @ Mar 7 2009, 05:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I agree that Gold Gloves are not a hard and fast measure of a fielder's prowess, but if by the age of 28, one guy has won 5 of them, and at the age of 30 the other guy hasn't won any, it's pretty safe to say that the 5GG guy is likely an elite fielder, and the other guy isn't.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

i never said that ramirez was a better field. i did say he's a good fielder though. when it's all said and done, ramirez will be the best thirdbaseman in cubs history, based on fielding and hitting combined. of this, i am completely certain.
Wang.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)