Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bullpen
CRAPARONI is truly the San Francisco treat.
I picture a pissed-off Amazon bitch; uncontrollable, disobedient, boldly resisting any kind of emotional shackles...angrily begging for more ejaculate. -KB

Showing your teeth is a sign of weakness in primates. Whenever someone smiles at me, all I see is a chimpanzee begging for its life. - Dwight

RIP Sarge
Reply
Cotts has the kind of face that you just want to slap repeatedly.
Reply
<!--quoteo-->QUOTE <!--quotec-->The Cubs' bullpen began Monday having stranded 84.8 percent of inherited runners, second in the league behind Philadelphia (95.5).<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I wonder how many of those runners were put on by other members of the bullpen in the first place.
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=33704:date=Apr 28 2009, 01:46 PM:name=The Dude)-->QUOTE (The Dude @ Apr 28 2009, 01:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <!--quotec-->The Cubs' bullpen began Monday having stranded 84.8 percent of inherited runners, second in the league behind Philadelphia (95.5).<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I wonder how many of those runners were put on by other members of the bullpen in the first place.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That's all Marmol cleaning up the mess like he did the last 2 years as well. Happy to get him back tonight, same with Milton.
@TheBlogfines
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=33705:date=Apr 28 2009, 02:48 PM:name=Clapp)-->QUOTE (Clapp @ Apr 28 2009, 02:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33704:date=Apr 28 2009, 01:46 PM:name=The Dude)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Dude @ Apr 28 2009, 01:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <!--quotec-->The Cubs' bullpen began Monday having stranded 84.8 percent of inherited runners, second in the league behind Philadelphia (95.5).<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I wonder how many of those runners were put on by other members of the bullpen in the first place.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That's all Marmol cleaning up the mess like he did the last 2 years as well. Happy to get him back tonight, same with Milton.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Hopefully Milton is fully mobile, otherwise I wish they'd DL him. Then again, maybe the warm AZ air will do him some good and get him hitting the way he was in ST.
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=33707:date=Apr 28 2009, 01:53 PM:name=rok)-->QUOTE (rok @ Apr 28 2009, 01:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33705:date=Apr 28 2009, 02:48 PM:name=Clapp)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Clapp @ Apr 28 2009, 02:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33704:date=Apr 28 2009, 01:46 PM:name=The Dude)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Dude @ Apr 28 2009, 01:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <!--quotec-->The Cubs' bullpen began Monday having stranded 84.8 percent of inherited runners, second in the league behind Philadelphia (95.5).<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I wonder how many of those runners were put on by other members of the bullpen in the first place.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That's all Marmol cleaning up the mess like he did the last 2 years as well. Happy to get him back tonight, same with Milton.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Hopefully Milton is fully mobile, otherwise I wish they'd DL him. Then again, maybe the warm AZ air will do him some good and get him hitting the way he was in ST.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
They said he looked terrific running around before the game yesterday. We'll see.
@TheBlogfines
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=33711:date=Apr 28 2009, 03:07 PM:name=Clapp)-->QUOTE (Clapp @ Apr 28 2009, 03:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33707:date=Apr 28 2009, 01:53 PM:name=rok)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (rok @ Apr 28 2009, 01:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33705:date=Apr 28 2009, 02:48 PM:name=Clapp)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Clapp @ Apr 28 2009, 02:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33704:date=Apr 28 2009, 01:46 PM:name=The Dude)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Dude @ Apr 28 2009, 01:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <!--quotec-->The Cubs' bullpen began Monday having stranded 84.8 percent of inherited runners, second in the league behind Philadelphia (95.5).<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I wonder how many of those runners were put on by other members of the bullpen in the first place.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That's all Marmol cleaning up the mess like he did the last 2 years as well. Happy to get him back tonight, same with Milton.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Hopefully Milton is fully mobile, otherwise I wish they'd DL him. Then again, maybe the warm AZ air will do him some good and get him hitting the way he was in ST.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
They said he looked terrific running around before the game yesterday. We'll see.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
From what I saw on TV, he looked at lot more mobile than the last time he was on the field. He looked like he was able to change directions much easier.
Reply
Gaudin started at Coors tonight, 5 scoreless.
@TheBlogfines
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=33894:date=Apr 28 2009, 10:31 PM:name=Clapp)-->QUOTE (Clapp @ Apr 28 2009, 10:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Gaudin started at Coors tonight, 5 scoreless.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img]

But, hey -- we have Patton!
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=33900:date=Apr 28 2009, 10:33 PM:name=Butcher)-->QUOTE (Butcher @ Apr 28 2009, 10:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33894:date=Apr 28 2009, 10:31 PM:name=Clapp)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Clapp @ Apr 28 2009, 10:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Gaudin started at Coors tonight, 5 scoreless.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img]

But, hey -- we have Patton!
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
So much for the Gaudin is an uncoachable drunk theory.
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=33909:date=Apr 28 2009, 10:39 PM:name=rok)-->QUOTE (rok @ Apr 28 2009, 10:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33900:date=Apr 28 2009, 10:33 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Apr 28 2009, 10:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33894:date=Apr 28 2009, 10:31 PM:name=Clapp)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Clapp @ Apr 28 2009, 10:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Gaudin started at Coors tonight, 5 scoreless.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img]

But, hey -- we have Patton!
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
So much for the Gaudin is an uncoachable drunk theory.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Not really. He got injured last year partying and was said the be upset he wasn't starting.
[Image: 2hz4sk2.jpg]
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=33915:date=Apr 28 2009, 10:45 PM:name=Baron)-->QUOTE (Baron @ Apr 28 2009, 10:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33909:date=Apr 28 2009, 10:39 PM:name=rok)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (rok @ Apr 28 2009, 10:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33900:date=Apr 28 2009, 10:33 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Apr 28 2009, 10:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33894:date=Apr 28 2009, 10:31 PM:name=Clapp)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Clapp @ Apr 28 2009, 10:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Gaudin started at Coors tonight, 5 scoreless.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img]

But, hey -- we have Patton!
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
So much for the Gaudin is an uncoachable drunk theory.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Not really. He got injured last year partying and was said the be upset he wasn't starting.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I understand that, but where would he have fit into the rotation last season or this season for that matter? This whole situation must be more complicated than we're led to believe.
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=33921:date=Apr 28 2009, 10:47 PM:name=rok)-->QUOTE (rok @ Apr 28 2009, 10:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33915:date=Apr 28 2009, 10:45 PM:name=Baron)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Baron @ Apr 28 2009, 10:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33909:date=Apr 28 2009, 10:39 PM:name=rok)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (rok @ Apr 28 2009, 10:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33900:date=Apr 28 2009, 10:33 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Apr 28 2009, 10:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33894:date=Apr 28 2009, 10:31 PM:name=Clapp)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Clapp @ Apr 28 2009, 10:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Gaudin started at Coors tonight, 5 scoreless.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img]

But, hey -- we have Patton!
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
So much for the Gaudin is an uncoachable drunk theory.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Not really. He got injured last year partying and was said the be upset he wasn't starting.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I understand that, but where would he have fit into the rotation last season or this season for that matter? This whole situation must be more complicated than we're led to believe.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I think Lou didn't like him the first time he coached him and wasn't thrilled to see him back, I have nothing to go on, but that's what my gut tells me.
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=33921:date=Apr 28 2009, 10:47 PM:name=rok)-->QUOTE (rok @ Apr 28 2009, 10:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33915:date=Apr 28 2009, 10:45 PM:name=Baron)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Baron @ Apr 28 2009, 10:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33909:date=Apr 28 2009, 10:39 PM:name=rok)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (rok @ Apr 28 2009, 10:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33900:date=Apr 28 2009, 10:33 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Apr 28 2009, 10:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33894:date=Apr 28 2009, 10:31 PM:name=Clapp)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Clapp @ Apr 28 2009, 10:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Gaudin started at Coors tonight, 5 scoreless.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img]

But, hey -- we have Patton!
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
So much for the Gaudin is an uncoachable drunk theory.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Not really. He got injured last year partying and was said the be upset he wasn't starting.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I understand that, but where would he have fit into the rotation last season or this season for that matter? This whole situation must be more complicated than we're led to believe.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Or he was looking out for himself. There wasn't a spot for him to start, which maybe he took offense to, and maybe Lou saw him as uncoachable.

Who knows, I'd much rather have him in the pen than Patton.
[Image: 2hz4sk2.jpg]
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=33924:date=Apr 28 2009, 10:48 PM:name=ruby23)-->QUOTE (ruby23 @ Apr 28 2009, 10:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33921:date=Apr 28 2009, 10:47 PM:name=rok)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (rok @ Apr 28 2009, 10:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33915:date=Apr 28 2009, 10:45 PM:name=Baron)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Baron @ Apr 28 2009, 10:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33909:date=Apr 28 2009, 10:39 PM:name=rok)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (rok @ Apr 28 2009, 10:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33900:date=Apr 28 2009, 10:33 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Apr 28 2009, 10:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33894:date=Apr 28 2009, 10:31 PM:name=Clapp)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Clapp @ Apr 28 2009, 10:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Gaudin started at Coors tonight, 5 scoreless.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/brickwall.gif[/img]

But, hey -- we have Patton!
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
So much for the Gaudin is an uncoachable drunk theory.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Not really. He got injured last year partying and was said the be upset he wasn't starting.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I understand that, but where would he have fit into the rotation last season or this season for that matter? This whole situation must be more complicated than we're led to believe.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I think Lou didn't like him the first time he coached him and wasn't thrilled to see him back, I have nothing to go on, but that's what my gut tells me.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That's kind of what I think as well. It seems like Lou right away decides who he does/doesn't like and sometimes makes some poor decisions on personnel as a result, especially in the bullpen.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)