<!--quoteo(post=25594:date=Mar 29 2009, 12:31 AM:name=Clapp)-->QUOTE (Clapp @ Mar 29 2009, 12:31 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=25587:date=Mar 28 2009, 09:54 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Mar 28 2009, 09:54 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=25585:date=Mar 28 2009, 11:38 PM:name=Clapp)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Clapp @ Mar 28 2009, 11:38 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I suggested that last week but then Fella correctly brought up how Guzman would have to make the roster. Guzman wouldn't make the rotation, and the only guy he could possibly beat out in the bullpen is Mike Lincoln, who was solid for them last year.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Lincoln sucks.
Plus, the Reds were so shitty last year that exposing Guzman to waivers may not be a risk to them.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
He had a 4.48 ERA for them in 70 appearances last year, and is making just $550 K. Plus you know how Dusty loves his vets. If Lincoln doesn't work out, they call up somebody like Homer Bailey and put him in the pen. Also, they believe they can contend this year and they don't want to fill the need of the team they're chasing. When was the last time we made a legitimate deal with a team in the division? The only one that clearly comes to mind to me is the Aram/Lofton deal, and that was when Pittsburgh was out of contention.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I don't know that I'd call Guzman/Keppinger a legitimate deal. I think they'd prefer to have Guzman to Lincoln this year even though they think they're competing. The upside is so much greater, and with Jocketty now in charge, this is the kind of move he makes. And he should. It's a smart move for them.