Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Cubs @ Padres --- 05/23/09
#61
So this cocksucker calls the strike at Bradley's chest, followed by a strike at Lee's ankles. Fucking douchebag.
I wish that I believed in Fate. I wish I didn't sleep so late. I used to be carried in the arms of cheerleaders.
Reply
#62
<!--quoteo(post=39735:date=May 23 2009, 09:37 PM:name=BT)-->QUOTE (BT @ May 23 2009, 09:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->So this cocksucker calls the strike at Bradley's chest, followed by a strike at Lee's ankles. Fucking douchebag.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yep, it's bullshit. Wells is getting jackshit for calls.
@TheBlogfines
Reply
#63
<!--quoteo(post=39730:date=May 23 2009, 10:30 PM:name=Clapp)-->QUOTE (Clapp @ May 23 2009, 10:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Theriot led the majors in singles last year. He had 22 in 82 April at bats. He has 5 in 73 at bats this month. Go on and on about OPS blah blah blah, this Ryan Theriot is not better for our team.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
If Theriot could sustain the power streak, then I'm all for it. But he can't. So I'd rather he start poking singles the other way than swinging for the fences and hitting weak flyouts.
Reply
#64
OH NOW HE CALLS THE CORNER AFTER WE'RE LOSING! FUCKING COCKLESS ASSFACE!
@TheBlogfines
Reply
#65
<!--quoteo(post=39735:date=May 23 2009, 10:37 PM:name=BT)-->QUOTE (BT @ May 23 2009, 10:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->So this cocksucker calls the strike at Bradley's chest, followed by a strike at Lee's ankles. Fucking douchebag.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Bradley never protects on a full count, though. He just assumes a walk is coming. I'm done with his sorry ass.
Reply
#66
<!--quoteo(post=39737:date=May 23 2009, 09:38 PM:name=Butcher)-->QUOTE (Butcher @ May 23 2009, 09:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=39730:date=May 23 2009, 10:30 PM:name=Clapp)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Clapp @ May 23 2009, 10:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Theriot led the majors in singles last year. He had 22 in 82 April at bats. He has 5 in 73 at bats this month. Go on and on about OPS blah blah blah, this Ryan Theriot is not better for our team.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
If Theriot could sustain the power streak, then I'm all for it. But he can't. So I'd rather he start poking singles the other way than swinging for the fences and hitting weak flyouts.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Right. That's what I'm saying. If I felt he could hit 20 homers, by all means go for it, but he won't. He <i>might </i>hit 10. He needs to go back to what he was doing before. If they try to sneak a fastball inside or there's a meatball on 3-1, turn on that and swing for the fence. However, he's doing this on pitches outside or when he's behind in the count. He's completely changed his approach at the plate, and he was a big reason we won 97 games last year.
@TheBlogfines
Reply
#67
<!--quoteo(post=39739:date=May 23 2009, 09:40 PM:name=Butcher)-->QUOTE (Butcher @ May 23 2009, 09:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=39735:date=May 23 2009, 10:37 PM:name=BT)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BT @ May 23 2009, 10:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->So this cocksucker calls the strike at Bradley's chest, followed by a strike at Lee's ankles. Fucking douchebag.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Bradley never protects on a full count, though. He just assumes a walk is coming. I'm done with his sorry ass.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
It was clearly ball 4 though, just like the St. Louis game.
@TheBlogfines
Reply
#68
<!--quoteo(post=39741:date=May 23 2009, 10:41 PM:name=Clapp)-->QUOTE (Clapp @ May 23 2009, 10:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=39739:date=May 23 2009, 09:40 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ May 23 2009, 09:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=39735:date=May 23 2009, 10:37 PM:name=BT)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BT @ May 23 2009, 10:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->So this cocksucker calls the strike at Bradley's chest, followed by a strike at Lee's ankles. Fucking douchebag.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Bradley never protects on a full count, though. He just assumes a walk is coming. I'm done with his sorry ass.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
It was clearly ball 4 though, just like the St. Louis game.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Not clearly enough, apparently.
Reply
#69
<!--quoteo(post=39740:date=May 23 2009, 10:40 PM:name=Clapp)-->QUOTE (Clapp @ May 23 2009, 10:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=39737:date=May 23 2009, 09:38 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ May 23 2009, 09:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=39730:date=May 23 2009, 10:30 PM:name=Clapp)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Clapp @ May 23 2009, 10:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Theriot led the majors in singles last year. He had 22 in 82 April at bats. He has 5 in 73 at bats this month. Go on and on about OPS blah blah blah, this Ryan Theriot is not better for our team.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
If Theriot could sustain the power streak, then I'm all for it. But he can't. So I'd rather he start poking singles the other way than swinging for the fences and hitting weak flyouts.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Right. That's what I'm saying. If I felt he could hit 20 homers, by all means go for it, but he won't. He <i>might </i>hit 10. He needs to go back to what he was doing before. If they try to sneak a fastball inside or there's a meatball on 3-1, turn on that and swing for the fence. However, he's doing this on pitches outside or when he's behind in the count. He's completely changed his approach at the plate, and he was a big reason we won 97 games last year.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm with ya.
Reply
#70
<!--quoteo(post=39742:date=May 23 2009, 09:43 PM:name=Butcher)-->QUOTE (Butcher @ May 23 2009, 09:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=39741:date=May 23 2009, 10:41 PM:name=Clapp)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Clapp @ May 23 2009, 10:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=39739:date=May 23 2009, 09:40 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ May 23 2009, 09:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=39735:date=May 23 2009, 10:37 PM:name=BT)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BT @ May 23 2009, 10:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->So this cocksucker calls the strike at Bradley's chest, followed by a strike at Lee's ankles. Fucking douchebag.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Bradley never protects on a full count, though. He just assumes a walk is coming. I'm done with his sorry ass.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
It was clearly ball 4 though, just like the St. Louis game.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Not clearly enough, apparently.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm a huge believer on protecting when it's close with 2 strikes, but if you have 3 balls and you think it's a ball, why would you swing? Even gameday has it as a ball.
@TheBlogfines
Reply
#71
Geo needs to stop swinging, those aren't close.
@TheBlogfines
Reply
#72
Nice swing from Fontenot again. Use Alf here.
@TheBlogfines
Reply
#73
<!--quoteo(post=39744:date=May 23 2009, 10:46 PM:name=Clapp)-->QUOTE (Clapp @ May 23 2009, 10:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=39742:date=May 23 2009, 09:43 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ May 23 2009, 09:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=39741:date=May 23 2009, 10:41 PM:name=Clapp)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Clapp @ May 23 2009, 10:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=39739:date=May 23 2009, 09:40 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ May 23 2009, 09:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=39735:date=May 23 2009, 10:37 PM:name=BT)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BT @ May 23 2009, 10:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->So this cocksucker calls the strike at Bradley's chest, followed by a strike at Lee's ankles. Fucking douchebag.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Bradley never protects on a full count, though. He just assumes a walk is coming. I'm done with his sorry ass.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
It was clearly ball 4 though, just like the St. Louis game.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Not clearly enough, apparently.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm a huge believer on protecting when it's close with 2 strikes, but if you have 3 balls and you think it's a ball, why would you swing? Even gameday has it as a ball.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
It was a ball, but it was close enough not to risk taking it.
Reply
#74
Fucking Josh Geer. Our entire team needs to fucking retire.
Reply
#75
<!--quoteo(post=39747:date=May 23 2009, 11:50 PM:name=Butcher)-->QUOTE (Butcher @ May 23 2009, 11:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=39744:date=May 23 2009, 10:46 PM:name=Clapp)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Clapp @ May 23 2009, 10:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=39742:date=May 23 2009, 09:43 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ May 23 2009, 09:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=39741:date=May 23 2009, 10:41 PM:name=Clapp)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Clapp @ May 23 2009, 10:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=39739:date=May 23 2009, 09:40 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ May 23 2009, 09:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=39735:date=May 23 2009, 10:37 PM:name=BT)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BT @ May 23 2009, 10:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->So this cocksucker calls the strike at Bradley's chest, followed by a strike at Lee's ankles. Fucking douchebag.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Bradley never protects on a full count, though. He just assumes a walk is coming. I'm done with his sorry ass.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
It was clearly ball 4 though, just like the St. Louis game.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Not clearly enough, apparently.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm a huge believer on protecting when it's close with 2 strikes, but if you have 3 balls and you think it's a ball, why would you swing? Even gameday has it as a ball.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
It was a ball, but it was close enough not to risk taking it.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
If he'd have swung and made an out, you'd have been screaming about him swinging at ball 4.
This is not some silly theory that's unsupported and deserves being mocked by photos of Xena.  [Image: ITgoyeg.png]
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)