Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Trade Deadline
#76
less than an hour to go!!
[Image: cubscopy.jpg]
Reply
#77
Rumors bouncing around now:
Adam LaRoche back to ATL Confirmed
Jerry Hairston Jr. to NYY Confirmed
Reply
#78
now the victor martinez trade is official
[Image: cubscopy.jpg]
Reply
#79
Beimel is a Rockie
Reply
#80
just saw on mlb network scott rolen to the reds
[Image: cubscopy.jpg]
Reply
#81
What the fuck are the Reds thinking? I thought that rumor was made up weeks ago. He's under contract through next year... but he's also making $11 million. He's hurt all the time and old.
@TheBlogfines
Reply
#82
<!--quoteo(post=54331:date=Jul 31 2009, 12:42 PM:name=Clapp)-->QUOTE (Clapp @ Jul 31 2009, 12:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->What the fuck are the Reds thinking? I thought that rumor was made up weeks ago. He's under contract through next year... but he's also making $11 million. He's hurt all the time and old.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

he still has damn good defense
[Image: cubscopy.jpg]
Reply
#83
<!--quoteo(post=54331:date=Jul 31 2009, 03:42 PM:name=Clapp)-->QUOTE (Clapp @ Jul 31 2009, 03:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->What the fuck are the Reds thinking? I thought that rumor was made up weeks ago. He's under contract through next year... but he's also making $11 million. He's hurt all the time and old.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
this is exactly the kind of player they don't need. walt jocketty is an idiot. the fact that dusty is still his manager proves that point.
Reply
#84
sox trade la roche to atlanta for kotchman
[Image: cubscopy.jpg]
Reply
#85
Rolen would have to waive his no trade clause, but that doesnt seem to be a problem.
Reply
#86
<!--quoteo(post=54336:date=Jul 31 2009, 12:48 PM:name=Coach)-->QUOTE (Coach @ Jul 31 2009, 12:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Rolen would have to waive his no trade clause, but that doesnt seem to be a problem.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

yeah he'll be closer to his hometown so i dont see why not
[Image: cubscopy.jpg]
Reply
#87
<!--quoteo(post=54316:date=Jul 31 2009, 03:21 PM:name=Coach)-->QUOTE (Coach @ Jul 31 2009, 03:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Jerry Hairston Jr. to NYY Confirmed<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Is it possible that the Yanks gave up their #1 prospect in Austin Jackson for him?

That can't be true.
Reply
#88
Dodgers after Adrian now.
Reply
#89
<!--quoteo(post=54341:date=Jul 31 2009, 01:52 PM:name=Coach)-->QUOTE (Coach @ Jul 31 2009, 01:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=54316:date=Jul 31 2009, 03:21 PM:name=Coach)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Coach @ Jul 31 2009, 03:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Jerry Hairston Jr. to NYY Confirmed<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Is it possible that the Yanks gave up their #1 prospect in Austin Jackson for him?

That can't be true.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I can't see that. And I fully expect Hairston to suck in a pennant race.
@TheBlogfines
Reply
#90
<!--quoteo(post=54345:date=Jul 31 2009, 01:57 PM:name=The Dude)-->QUOTE (The Dude @ Jul 31 2009, 01:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Dodgers after Adrian now.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That would be a nice final fuck you from Kevin Towers to the Padres fans.
@TheBlogfines
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)