Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
WR Moves
#1
Schedule accordingly
Reply
#2
Considering I have both Edwards and Cotchery on my roster I'm not sure I like this too much.
Reply
#3
<!--quoteo(post=65864:date=Oct 7 2009, 05:03 PM:name=Brock)-->QUOTE (Brock @ Oct 7 2009, 05:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Considering I have both Edwards and Cotchery on my roster I'm not sure I like this too much.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Good for one, bad for the other.
Cubs News and Rumors at Bleacher Nation.
Reply
#4
<!--quoteo(post=65905:date=Oct 7 2009, 05:50 PM:name=Ace)-->QUOTE (Ace @ Oct 7 2009, 05:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65864:date=Oct 7 2009, 05:03 PM:name=Brock)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brock @ Oct 7 2009, 05:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Considering I have both Edwards and Cotchery on my roster I'm not sure I like this too much.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Good for one, bad for the other.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I'm not seeing it.
Reply
#5
<!--quoteo(post=65910:date=Oct 7 2009, 08:11 PM:name=ColoradoCub)-->QUOTE (ColoradoCub @ Oct 7 2009, 08:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65905:date=Oct 7 2009, 05:50 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Oct 7 2009, 05:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65864:date=Oct 7 2009, 05:03 PM:name=Brock)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brock @ Oct 7 2009, 05:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Considering I have both Edwards and Cotchery on my roster I'm not sure I like this too much.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Good for one, bad for the other.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I'm not seeing it.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Edwards wasn't doing shit in Cleveland, even after the move to Anderson. This can only help him.
Cubs News and Rumors at Bleacher Nation.
Reply
#6
<!--quoteo(post=65912:date=Oct 7 2009, 06:22 PM:name=Ace)-->QUOTE (Ace @ Oct 7 2009, 06:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65910:date=Oct 7 2009, 08:11 PM:name=ColoradoCub)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ColoradoCub @ Oct 7 2009, 08:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65905:date=Oct 7 2009, 05:50 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Oct 7 2009, 05:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65864:date=Oct 7 2009, 05:03 PM:name=Brock)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brock @ Oct 7 2009, 05:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Considering I have both Edwards and Cotchery on my roster I'm not sure I like this too much.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Good for one, bad for the other.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I'm not seeing it.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Edwards wasn't doing shit in Cleveland, even after the move to Anderson. This can only help him.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Sure he was... he was dropping balls left and right.
Reply
#7
<!--quoteo(post=65914:date=Oct 7 2009, 08:30 PM:name=ColoradoCub)-->QUOTE (ColoradoCub @ Oct 7 2009, 08:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65912:date=Oct 7 2009, 06:22 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Oct 7 2009, 06:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65910:date=Oct 7 2009, 08:11 PM:name=ColoradoCub)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ColoradoCub @ Oct 7 2009, 08:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65905:date=Oct 7 2009, 05:50 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Oct 7 2009, 05:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65864:date=Oct 7 2009, 05:03 PM:name=Brock)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brock @ Oct 7 2009, 05:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Considering I have both Edwards and Cotchery on my roster I'm not sure I like this too much.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Good for one, bad for the other.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I'm not seeing it.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Edwards wasn't doing shit in Cleveland, even after the move to Anderson. This can only help him.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Sure he was... he was dropping balls left and right.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Yes, but now he'll have more offensive series in which to... well, drop balls.
Cubs News and Rumors at Bleacher Nation.
Reply
#8
<!--quoteo(post=65916:date=Oct 7 2009, 06:40 PM:name=Ace)-->QUOTE (Ace @ Oct 7 2009, 06:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65914:date=Oct 7 2009, 08:30 PM:name=ColoradoCub)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ColoradoCub @ Oct 7 2009, 08:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65912:date=Oct 7 2009, 06:22 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Oct 7 2009, 06:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65910:date=Oct 7 2009, 08:11 PM:name=ColoradoCub)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ColoradoCub @ Oct 7 2009, 08:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65905:date=Oct 7 2009, 05:50 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Oct 7 2009, 05:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65864:date=Oct 7 2009, 05:03 PM:name=Brock)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brock @ Oct 7 2009, 05:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Considering I have both Edwards and Cotchery on my roster I'm not sure I like this too much.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Good for one, bad for the other.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I'm not seeing it.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Edwards wasn't doing shit in Cleveland, even after the move to Anderson. This can only help him.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Sure he was... he was dropping balls left and right.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Yes, but now he'll have more offensive series in which to... well, drop balls.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

And solid competition for targets from Keller, Cotchery, Washington, etc.
Reply
#9
<!--quoteo(post=65917:date=Oct 7 2009, 08:47 PM:name=ColoradoCub)-->QUOTE (ColoradoCub @ Oct 7 2009, 08:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65916:date=Oct 7 2009, 06:40 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Oct 7 2009, 06:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65914:date=Oct 7 2009, 08:30 PM:name=ColoradoCub)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ColoradoCub @ Oct 7 2009, 08:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65912:date=Oct 7 2009, 06:22 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Oct 7 2009, 06:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65910:date=Oct 7 2009, 08:11 PM:name=ColoradoCub)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ColoradoCub @ Oct 7 2009, 08:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65905:date=Oct 7 2009, 05:50 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Oct 7 2009, 05:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65864:date=Oct 7 2009, 05:03 PM:name=Brock)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brock @ Oct 7 2009, 05:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Considering I have both Edwards and Cotchery on my roster I'm not sure I like this too much.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Good for one, bad for the other.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I'm not seeing it.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Edwards wasn't doing shit in Cleveland, even after the move to Anderson. This can only help him.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Sure he was... he was dropping balls left and right.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Yes, but now he'll have more offensive series in which to... well, drop balls.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

And solid competition for targets from Keller, Cotchery, Washington, etc.

<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Based on what the Jets gave up, they clearly view him as superior to the other offensive players, perhaps outside Cotchery.

You might be right that the value is a wash to him, fantasy-wise, but as a general rule, I'd much rather have the number 2 receiver on an average offensive team than the number 1 receiver on a crappy offensive team.
Cubs News and Rumors at Bleacher Nation.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)