10-07-2009, 08:46 AM
10-07-2009, 05:03 PM
Considering I have both Edwards and Cotchery on my roster I'm not sure I like this too much.
10-07-2009, 07:50 PM
<!--quoteo(post=65864:date=Oct 7 2009, 05:03 PM:name=Brock)-->QUOTE (Brock @ Oct 7 2009, 05:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Considering I have both Edwards and Cotchery on my roster I'm not sure I like this too much.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Good for one, bad for the other.
Good for one, bad for the other.
10-07-2009, 08:11 PM
<!--quoteo(post=65905:date=Oct 7 2009, 05:50 PM:name=Ace)-->QUOTE (Ace @ Oct 7 2009, 05:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65864:date=Oct 7 2009, 05:03 PM:name=Brock)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brock @ Oct 7 2009, 05:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Considering I have both Edwards and Cotchery on my roster I'm not sure I like this too much.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Good for one, bad for the other.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm not seeing it.
Good for one, bad for the other.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm not seeing it.
10-07-2009, 08:22 PM
<!--quoteo(post=65910:date=Oct 7 2009, 08:11 PM:name=ColoradoCub)-->QUOTE (ColoradoCub @ Oct 7 2009, 08:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65905:date=Oct 7 2009, 05:50 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Oct 7 2009, 05:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65864:date=Oct 7 2009, 05:03 PM:name=Brock)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brock @ Oct 7 2009, 05:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Considering I have both Edwards and Cotchery on my roster I'm not sure I like this too much.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Good for one, bad for the other.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm not seeing it.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Edwards wasn't doing shit in Cleveland, even after the move to Anderson. This can only help him.
Good for one, bad for the other.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm not seeing it.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Edwards wasn't doing shit in Cleveland, even after the move to Anderson. This can only help him.
10-07-2009, 08:30 PM
<!--quoteo(post=65912:date=Oct 7 2009, 06:22 PM:name=Ace)-->QUOTE (Ace @ Oct 7 2009, 06:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65910:date=Oct 7 2009, 08:11 PM:name=ColoradoCub)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ColoradoCub @ Oct 7 2009, 08:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65905:date=Oct 7 2009, 05:50 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Oct 7 2009, 05:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65864:date=Oct 7 2009, 05:03 PM:name=Brock)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brock @ Oct 7 2009, 05:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Considering I have both Edwards and Cotchery on my roster I'm not sure I like this too much.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Good for one, bad for the other.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm not seeing it.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Edwards wasn't doing shit in Cleveland, even after the move to Anderson. This can only help him.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Sure he was... he was dropping balls left and right.
Good for one, bad for the other.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm not seeing it.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Edwards wasn't doing shit in Cleveland, even after the move to Anderson. This can only help him.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Sure he was... he was dropping balls left and right.
10-07-2009, 08:40 PM
<!--quoteo(post=65914:date=Oct 7 2009, 08:30 PM:name=ColoradoCub)-->QUOTE (ColoradoCub @ Oct 7 2009, 08:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65912:date=Oct 7 2009, 06:22 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Oct 7 2009, 06:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65910:date=Oct 7 2009, 08:11 PM:name=ColoradoCub)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ColoradoCub @ Oct 7 2009, 08:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65905:date=Oct 7 2009, 05:50 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Oct 7 2009, 05:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65864:date=Oct 7 2009, 05:03 PM:name=Brock)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brock @ Oct 7 2009, 05:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Considering I have both Edwards and Cotchery on my roster I'm not sure I like this too much.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Good for one, bad for the other.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm not seeing it.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Edwards wasn't doing shit in Cleveland, even after the move to Anderson. This can only help him.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Sure he was... he was dropping balls left and right.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yes, but now he'll have more offensive series in which to... well, drop balls.
Good for one, bad for the other.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm not seeing it.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Edwards wasn't doing shit in Cleveland, even after the move to Anderson. This can only help him.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Sure he was... he was dropping balls left and right.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yes, but now he'll have more offensive series in which to... well, drop balls.
10-07-2009, 08:47 PM
<!--quoteo(post=65916:date=Oct 7 2009, 06:40 PM:name=Ace)-->QUOTE (Ace @ Oct 7 2009, 06:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65914:date=Oct 7 2009, 08:30 PM:name=ColoradoCub)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ColoradoCub @ Oct 7 2009, 08:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65912:date=Oct 7 2009, 06:22 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Oct 7 2009, 06:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65910:date=Oct 7 2009, 08:11 PM:name=ColoradoCub)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ColoradoCub @ Oct 7 2009, 08:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65905:date=Oct 7 2009, 05:50 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Oct 7 2009, 05:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65864:date=Oct 7 2009, 05:03 PM:name=Brock)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brock @ Oct 7 2009, 05:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Considering I have both Edwards and Cotchery on my roster I'm not sure I like this too much.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Good for one, bad for the other.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm not seeing it.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Edwards wasn't doing shit in Cleveland, even after the move to Anderson. This can only help him.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Sure he was... he was dropping balls left and right.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yes, but now he'll have more offensive series in which to... well, drop balls.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
And solid competition for targets from Keller, Cotchery, Washington, etc.
Good for one, bad for the other.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm not seeing it.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Edwards wasn't doing shit in Cleveland, even after the move to Anderson. This can only help him.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Sure he was... he was dropping balls left and right.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yes, but now he'll have more offensive series in which to... well, drop balls.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
And solid competition for targets from Keller, Cotchery, Washington, etc.
10-07-2009, 09:06 PM
<!--quoteo(post=65917:date=Oct 7 2009, 08:47 PM:name=ColoradoCub)-->QUOTE (ColoradoCub @ Oct 7 2009, 08:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65916:date=Oct 7 2009, 06:40 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Oct 7 2009, 06:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65914:date=Oct 7 2009, 08:30 PM:name=ColoradoCub)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ColoradoCub @ Oct 7 2009, 08:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65912:date=Oct 7 2009, 06:22 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Oct 7 2009, 06:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65910:date=Oct 7 2009, 08:11 PM:name=ColoradoCub)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ColoradoCub @ Oct 7 2009, 08:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65905:date=Oct 7 2009, 05:50 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Oct 7 2009, 05:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=65864:date=Oct 7 2009, 05:03 PM:name=Brock)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brock @ Oct 7 2009, 05:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Considering I have both Edwards and Cotchery on my roster I'm not sure I like this too much.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Good for one, bad for the other.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm not seeing it.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Edwards wasn't doing shit in Cleveland, even after the move to Anderson. This can only help him.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Sure he was... he was dropping balls left and right.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yes, but now he'll have more offensive series in which to... well, drop balls.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
And solid competition for targets from Keller, Cotchery, Washington, etc.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Based on what the Jets gave up, they clearly view him as superior to the other offensive players, perhaps outside Cotchery.
You might be right that the value is a wash to him, fantasy-wise, but as a general rule, I'd much rather have the number 2 receiver on an average offensive team than the number 1 receiver on a crappy offensive team.
Good for one, bad for the other.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm not seeing it.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Edwards wasn't doing shit in Cleveland, even after the move to Anderson. This can only help him.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Sure he was... he was dropping balls left and right.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yes, but now he'll have more offensive series in which to... well, drop balls.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
And solid competition for targets from Keller, Cotchery, Washington, etc.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Based on what the Jets gave up, they clearly view him as superior to the other offensive players, perhaps outside Cotchery.
You might be right that the value is a wash to him, fantasy-wise, but as a general rule, I'd much rather have the number 2 receiver on an average offensive team than the number 1 receiver on a crappy offensive team.