12-26-2008, 08:24 PM
<!--quoteo(post=7031:date=Dec 26 2008, 06:53 PM:name=Brock)-->QUOTE (Brock @ Dec 26 2008, 06:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=7030:date=Dec 26 2008, 05:46 PM:name=Dingo)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Dingo @ Dec 26 2008, 05:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=7026:date=Dec 27 2008, 10:33 AM:name=Clapp)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Clapp @ Dec 27 2008, 10:33 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->We should only be trading Marquis if we're getting another starting pitcher.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Bingo... At the moment, we have no one to replace him.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Marshall?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
We need 6 starting pitchers with Harden. Marquis is better than all of our other options.
I was under the assumption we could afford Bradley without dealing Marquis. It was getting him and Peavy that required a Marquis trade.
Bingo... At the moment, we have no one to replace him.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Marshall?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
We need 6 starting pitchers with Harden. Marquis is better than all of our other options.
I was under the assumption we could afford Bradley without dealing Marquis. It was getting him and Peavy that required a Marquis trade.
@TheBlogfines