04-28-2010, 05:56 PM
<!--quoteo(post=93409:date=Apr 28 2010, 04:53 PM:name=Destined)-->QUOTE (Destined @ Apr 28 2010, 04:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=93403:date=Apr 28 2010, 02:45 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Apr 28 2010, 02:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=93401:date=Apr 28 2010, 04:42 PM:name=Destined)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Destined @ Apr 28 2010, 04:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I get the Cards/Royals argument, but I think that's being nit-picky. Since Interleague play began, the Cardinals are 33-24 vs. KC, and the Cubs are 35-37 vs. CWS. That's only 5 1/2 games over the course of 13 years. Also, what's the difference than the one extra series that we have against another NL team every tear. We played 3 series against the Padres last year, and the Cards played the Mets an extra series. That warrants an equal argument, if you guys are going to worry about the Royals.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
33-24 vs. 35-37 doesn't add up. Do we play the Sox more than the Cards play the Royals?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yes. There were a bunch of times they only played 3 games.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Oh.
Regardless. We're 2 games under .500 against the Sox and they're 9 games over .500 against the Royals. I don't see how you don't have a problem with that. In a tight division race, that series could make the difference between playing in the postseason or going home.
33-24 vs. 35-37 doesn't add up. Do we play the Sox more than the Cards play the Royals?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yes. There were a bunch of times they only played 3 games.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Oh.
Regardless. We're 2 games under .500 against the Sox and they're 9 games over .500 against the Royals. I don't see how you don't have a problem with that. In a tight division race, that series could make the difference between playing in the postseason or going home.