04-04-2010, 11:25 PM
<!--quoteo(post=85864:date=Apr 4 2010, 09:15 PM:name=Dave)-->QUOTE (Dave @ Apr 4 2010, 09:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=85859:date=Apr 4 2010, 09:52 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Apr 4 2010, 09:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->There's a shitload of bad teams in the NL.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Nats, Astros, Pirates, Padres are the team guaranteed to be shit. The Mets and Reds will likely be shit. The Marlins, Brewers, Dodgers, Giants and D-Backs have a shot at competing but also have huge holes. That leaves the Cubs, Cards, Braves, Phils and Rockies as teams I feel comfortable saying will have winning seasons.
In other words, you're right, lot-o-shit here.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'd be quite shocked if the Dodgers didn't have <b>at least</b> a winning season. Manny missed 50 games last year and they still led the majors in run differential. I still think they win the West.
Nats, Astros, Pirates, Padres are the team guaranteed to be shit. The Mets and Reds will likely be shit. The Marlins, Brewers, Dodgers, Giants and D-Backs have a shot at competing but also have huge holes. That leaves the Cubs, Cards, Braves, Phils and Rockies as teams I feel comfortable saying will have winning seasons.
In other words, you're right, lot-o-shit here.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'd be quite shocked if the Dodgers didn't have <b>at least</b> a winning season. Manny missed 50 games last year and they still led the majors in run differential. I still think they win the West.
@TheBlogfines