12-17-2008, 02:49 AM
<!--quoteo(post=5373:date=Dec 17 2008, 01:36 AM:name=KBwsb)-->QUOTE (KBwsb @ Dec 17 2008, 01:36 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->The thing is, DeRosa can also play other positions, so it's not like he won't get playing time. In fact, given the inevitable 40-50 games that Bradley will miss, he'll likely get a lot of work in RF.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Oh I'm fine with DeRo playing anywhere and I've been fine with the idea of Fontenot at 2B, and DeRo in RF. I figure if Fontenot faded, we trade for a right fielder before the deadline. But if we sign Bradley or some other RF, and we're at opening day, I don't see how you could really start Fontenot over DeRosa at 2B.
Oh I'm fine with DeRo playing anywhere and I've been fine with the idea of Fontenot at 2B, and DeRo in RF. I figure if Fontenot faded, we trade for a right fielder before the deadline. But if we sign Bradley or some other RF, and we're at opening day, I don't see how you could really start Fontenot over DeRosa at 2B.
@TheBlogfines