An observation regarding Sammy Sosa

[leonardsipes]

<!--quoteo(post=79187:date=Feb 10 2010, 11:52 AM:name=VanSlawAndCottoCheese)-->QUOTE (VanSlawAndCottoCheese @ Feb 10 2010, 11:52 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I know this is tangential--and I'm not claiming that you're standing squarely with the baseball writers--but I can't help but feel that in the cases of some of these writers (and probably many of them), their "no" votes is hypocritical for McGwire. Many fans were throwing roids accusations (unfounded, sure, but with good reason for suspicion) back in 1998. How many of these writers--journalists, supposedly--looked into these rumors at the time? How many of them just went along for the ride, as writing about the home run chase was good ink? And if they didn't find it odd that, say, Luis Gonzalez was cranking 50+ home runs, what the hell kind of journalists are they?

I'm not relieving the players of their guilt for the decision to roid up, but these players had a network of enablers, including the journalists. Some of these people are dispensing justice a little late in the game.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I think this is something we should all agree on. The woman who was beat writer for the A's for many years, wrote a column when McGuire was first up for the hall. Some bullshit about her respect for her son giving a reason to do the right thing and not vote for him. I find her vile. Steroids paid her salary, and bought her son a lot of Christmas presents. She did not do the right thing when it would have jeopardized her job.