07-30-2009, 08:07 AM
<!--quoteo(post=53541:date=Jul 30 2009, 06:42 AM:name=veryzer)-->QUOTE (veryzer @ Jul 30 2009, 06:42 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=53509:date=Jul 30 2009, 12:11 AM:name=BT)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BT @ Jul 30 2009, 12:11 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=53047:date=Jul 29 2009, 09:51 AM:name=veryzer)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (veryzer @ Jul 29 2009, 09:51 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=53041:date=Jul 29 2009, 09:35 AM:name=rok)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (rok @ Jul 29 2009, 09:35 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=53038:date=Jul 29 2009, 09:25 AM:name=Coldneck)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Coldneck @ Jul 29 2009, 09:25 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->DeRosa seems to hit a HR every game for them.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
So much for him "aging" and being ready to fall off a cliff after 3 consecutive career years. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif[/img]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
right. i never understood that argument.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
the argument was, and is, a guy who has a career year at 32 is unlikely to keep it up, let alone get better. It's possible, and DeRosa seems to be bucking the trend, but in most cases a guy will get worse after that.
to put it another way, the cubs have invested in both trade and free agent $$ in tons of guys who put their best season together after they turn 30. It has rarely worked out for them. Unless you were a big fan of the Blauser signing.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
he had three career years in a row. i thought he might regress a little this year, but not significantly. i figured .280/15/70. looks like i was wrong.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
DeRosa wasn't going to require a big investment. $5.5M this season. And I think it's reasonable to expect a slight regression, but why should he fall off a cliff? Fuck, I wish we still had him instead of Fontenot.
So much for him "aging" and being ready to fall off a cliff after 3 consecutive career years. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif[/img]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
right. i never understood that argument.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
the argument was, and is, a guy who has a career year at 32 is unlikely to keep it up, let alone get better. It's possible, and DeRosa seems to be bucking the trend, but in most cases a guy will get worse after that.
to put it another way, the cubs have invested in both trade and free agent $$ in tons of guys who put their best season together after they turn 30. It has rarely worked out for them. Unless you were a big fan of the Blauser signing.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
he had three career years in a row. i thought he might regress a little this year, but not significantly. i figured .280/15/70. looks like i was wrong.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
DeRosa wasn't going to require a big investment. $5.5M this season. And I think it's reasonable to expect a slight regression, but why should he fall off a cliff? Fuck, I wish we still had him instead of Fontenot.