Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The future of analyzing fielding
#5
<!--quoteo(post=49171:date=Jul 10 2009, 01:22 PM:name=Butcher)-->QUOTE (Butcher @ Jul 10 2009, 01:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=49167:date=Jul 10 2009, 01:08 PM:name=Oatmealcookie)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Oatmealcookie @ Jul 10 2009, 01:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I have no idea how youd even put that information into context of good or average or bad.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Did you read the entire article? The system measures damn near everything.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->


Actually no. I just took a look at the picture and i think i felt a raisin pop just thinking about that.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
The future of analyzing fielding - by Butcher - 07-10-2009, 01:36 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by rok - 07-10-2009, 02:18 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by Butcher - 07-10-2009, 02:22 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by Oatmealcookie - 07-10-2009, 02:26 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by Quinn - 07-10-2009, 02:28 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by Butcher - 07-10-2009, 02:30 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by The Dude - 07-10-2009, 02:31 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by The Dude - 07-10-2009, 02:32 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by Quinn - 07-10-2009, 02:36 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by Clapp - 07-10-2009, 02:46 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by The Dude - 07-10-2009, 02:59 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by Quinn - 07-10-2009, 03:12 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by kbwsb - 07-10-2009, 06:33 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by kbwsb - 07-10-2009, 06:34 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by cigar - 07-10-2009, 06:50 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by kbwsb - 07-13-2009, 03:04 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)