Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The future of analyzing fielding
#3
<!--quoteo(post=49167:date=Jul 10 2009, 01:08 PM:name=Oatmealcookie)-->QUOTE (Oatmealcookie @ Jul 10 2009, 01:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I have no idea how youd even put that information into context of good or average or bad.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'd imagine you could create a multi-factor model that combines reaction time ratings relative to ground covered to approximate range and combine it with fielding %. Not sure if it would tell the whole story because context and positioning are so important to fielding, but it is better than what we currently have.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
The future of analyzing fielding - by Butcher - 07-10-2009, 01:36 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by rok - 07-10-2009, 02:18 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by Butcher - 07-10-2009, 02:22 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by Quinn - 07-10-2009, 02:28 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by Butcher - 07-10-2009, 02:30 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by The Dude - 07-10-2009, 02:31 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by The Dude - 07-10-2009, 02:32 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by Quinn - 07-10-2009, 02:36 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by Clapp - 07-10-2009, 02:46 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by The Dude - 07-10-2009, 02:59 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by Quinn - 07-10-2009, 03:12 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by kbwsb - 07-10-2009, 06:33 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by kbwsb - 07-10-2009, 06:34 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by cigar - 07-10-2009, 06:50 PM
The future of analyzing fielding - by kbwsb - 07-13-2009, 03:04 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)