The likelyhood of Peavy

[sleepyhead]

<!--quoteo(post=39081:date=May 21 2009, 10:05 AM:name=ColoradoCub)-->QUOTE (ColoradoCub @ May 21 2009, 10:05 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=39080:date=May 21 2009, 09:03 AM:name=Coldneck)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Coldneck @ May 21 2009, 09:03 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=39079:date=May 21 2009, 10:59 AM:name=sleepyhead)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (sleepyhead @ May 21 2009, 10:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=39077:date=May 21 2009, 09:57 AM:name=Coldneck)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Coldneck @ May 21 2009, 09:57 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->The Hoff, Fox, Soto and Shark for Gonzalez. I'd do that in a second. Lee can be a backup for all I care. If we traded him to SD we'd have to pay his entire salary anyway.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Soto? I don't think I'd go there, but everything else yes.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

For Gonzalez, I'd trade Soto in a second. If we ended up with A. Gonz I have a feeling we'd be losing Vitters. So maybe Vitters, Shark, Hoff and Fox.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

And that wouldn't be enough
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

It would have to be: Vitters, Shark, Hoff, Wells/Marshall or something like that. It would be more then for Peavy (or it should be)