Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Joe Beimel for LOOGY?
#24
<!--quoteo(post=22662:date=Mar 9 2009, 09:16 PM:name=Brock)-->QUOTE (Brock @ Mar 9 2009, 09:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=22661:date=Mar 9 2009, 10:15 PM:name=Clapp)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Clapp @ Mar 9 2009, 10:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=22659:date=Mar 9 2009, 09:13 PM:name=Brock)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brock @ Mar 9 2009, 09:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=22640:date=Mar 9 2009, 08:08 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Mar 9 2009, 08:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=22624:date=Mar 9 2009, 07:25 PM:name=Dingo)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Dingo @ Mar 9 2009, 07:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Reports have indicated that Cotts has been outstanding in spring training so far. It's his job to lose at the moment.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

There's still an open spot after Cotts if you don't include Guzman and Samardzija.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Why aren't we including Samardzija?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
He's most likely going to be in Iowa starting.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I've seen it mentioned but is that really the most likely scenario? If so that's kind of stupid, IMO.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Well they want him to be a starter and if that's the case, they're better off getting that process going now, get him to develop his other pitches and stay stretched out. We have so many capable arms for that last bullpen spot that we can afford to do it.
@TheBlogfines
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by kbwsb - 03-09-2009, 06:22 AM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by ruby23 - 03-09-2009, 07:43 AM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Ace - 03-09-2009, 08:05 AM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Fella - 03-09-2009, 08:15 AM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by bz - 03-09-2009, 01:13 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by rok - 03-09-2009, 01:15 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Brock - 03-09-2009, 02:25 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Gad - 03-09-2009, 02:33 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Brock - 03-09-2009, 02:39 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by kbwsb - 03-09-2009, 03:17 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Clapp - 03-09-2009, 03:46 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Brock - 03-09-2009, 03:53 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Clapp - 03-09-2009, 04:08 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Scarey - 03-09-2009, 07:08 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by leonardsipes - 03-09-2009, 07:24 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Auz - 03-09-2009, 07:25 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Ace - 03-09-2009, 09:08 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by ruby23 - 03-09-2009, 09:08 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by ruby23 - 03-09-2009, 09:08 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Brock - 03-09-2009, 11:13 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Brock - 03-09-2009, 11:14 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Clapp - 03-09-2009, 11:15 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Brock - 03-09-2009, 11:16 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Clapp - 03-09-2009, 11:25 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Clapp - 03-09-2009, 11:31 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Brock - 03-09-2009, 11:44 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by veryzer - 03-10-2009, 08:05 AM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Coach - 03-10-2009, 09:06 AM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by bz - 03-11-2009, 04:34 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by kbwsb - 03-11-2009, 04:42 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by veryzer - 03-12-2009, 09:39 AM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by bz - 03-12-2009, 02:31 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Andy - 04-20-2009, 03:45 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Scarey - 04-20-2009, 03:50 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Andy - 04-20-2009, 03:55 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by sleepyhead - 04-20-2009, 04:02 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by kbwsb - 04-20-2009, 04:04 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Clapp - 04-20-2009, 04:09 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Scarey - 04-20-2009, 04:18 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by sleepyhead - 04-20-2009, 04:28 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by rok - 04-20-2009, 04:33 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Fella - 04-20-2009, 05:39 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by cigar - 04-20-2009, 06:10 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Kid - 04-20-2009, 09:53 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by cigar - 04-20-2009, 10:03 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Kid - 04-20-2009, 10:04 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by cigar - 04-20-2009, 10:07 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Fella - 04-20-2009, 10:22 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by rok - 04-21-2009, 12:09 AM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by kbwsb - 04-21-2009, 09:55 AM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by BT - 04-21-2009, 11:47 AM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by ruby23 - 04-21-2009, 11:50 AM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by rok - 04-21-2009, 11:50 AM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by ruby23 - 04-21-2009, 11:51 AM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by BT - 04-21-2009, 11:55 AM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by rok - 04-21-2009, 11:56 AM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by rok - 04-21-2009, 11:57 AM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by BT - 04-21-2009, 12:12 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by rok - 04-21-2009, 01:12 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by twitterwoods - 04-21-2009, 02:49 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Clapp - 04-21-2009, 04:53 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by rok - 04-22-2009, 12:03 AM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by AlexV - 04-22-2009, 12:07 AM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by kbwsb - 04-22-2009, 12:41 AM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Clapp - 04-22-2009, 01:13 AM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by sleepyhead - 04-22-2009, 08:32 AM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by veryzer - 04-22-2009, 08:36 AM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by rok - 04-22-2009, 10:43 AM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by sleepyhead - 04-22-2009, 11:28 AM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Coach - 04-22-2009, 11:43 AM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by rok - 04-22-2009, 11:50 AM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Clapp - 04-22-2009, 02:31 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by sleepyhead - 04-22-2009, 03:52 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Andy - 04-22-2009, 04:12 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by sleepyhead - 04-22-2009, 04:33 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Coach - 04-22-2009, 04:36 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by sleepyhead - 04-22-2009, 04:42 PM
Joe Beimel for LOOGY? - by Clapp - 04-23-2009, 03:32 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)