01-07-2009, 08:05 PM
<!--quoteo(post=9874:date=Jan 7 2009, 04:55 PM:name=ruby23)-->QUOTE (ruby23 @ Jan 7 2009, 04:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=9860:date=Jan 7 2009, 04:10 PM:name=KBwsb)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (KBwsb @ Jan 7 2009, 04:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Man, that's a pretty gruesome list. At least Fox pounded the ball. Marmol was Marmol for 2 innings.
You'd think Guzman, Cedeno and Pie would do a whole lot better than those numbers, especially considering the competition.
Rich Hill....sigh.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I think Cedeno's and Pie's numbers look pretty good.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Pie's strike out/walk rate doesn't look good but does it really matter. Fox puts up very good numbers but he will likely only be a call up every now and then. It's like when Fuld put up gaudy numbers in a league and every one thought he might actually be a prospect and challenge for the starting job a couple of years ago.
You'd think Guzman, Cedeno and Pie would do a whole lot better than those numbers, especially considering the competition.
Rich Hill....sigh.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I think Cedeno's and Pie's numbers look pretty good.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Pie's strike out/walk rate doesn't look good but does it really matter. Fox puts up very good numbers but he will likely only be a call up every now and then. It's like when Fuld put up gaudy numbers in a league and every one thought he might actually be a prospect and challenge for the starting job a couple of years ago.