Milton Bradley and Cubs agree to deal?

[SandbergMVP1984]

<!--quoteo(post=9080:date=Jan 5 2009, 02:25 PM:name=veryzer)-->QUOTE (veryzer @ Jan 5 2009, 02:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=9049:date=Jan 5 2009, 02:03 PM:name=KBwsb)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (KBwsb @ Jan 5 2009, 02:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I'm all for getting Bradley, but mostly for entertainment reasons. He's awesome for that.
As for his value to the team, he's Kerry Wood (to a T).
World-class talent, truly shocking injury history.

Since he became a starter, these are Bradley's GAMES PLAYED:
last year: 126
2007-<!--coloro:#FF0000--><!--/coloro-->61<!--colorc-->
<!--/colorc--> (2-year average of 94)
2006-96 (3-year average of 94)
2005-75 (4-year average of 90)
2004-141 (5 year average of 100)
2003-101 (6 year average of 100)
2002-98 (7 year average of, well, 99.7, or less than 100 games per year)

So pick your number folks. At almost any point in his career, he seems to be a <i>lock</i>
for missing 60+ games. And we just traded DeRosa. And no DH to fall back on. Wheeee!<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->


no dh to fall back on? what does that mean?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm guessing it means that we can't put Bradley in at DH to get production out of him if he can't play the field because of an injury.