Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Draft
#46
From everything I've been hearing about Jackson, it sounds like scouts have him pegged as a guy that can add weight and swing a big bat. I hope that's the direction the Cubs go with him. Overall, I'm not too optimistic though.
Reply
#47
Wasn't Tim Wheeler (who went to the Rox with the next pick) supposed to be a superior CF?
There's nothing better than to realize that the good things about youth don't end with youth itself. It's a matter of realizing that life can be renewed every day you get out of bed without baggage. It's tough to get there, but it's better than the dark thoughts. -Lance
Reply
#48
I hate the Brett Jackson pick.
Reply
#49
Hmm, I'm going to go with Wilken on this one, seeing as how he has actually, you know, sent out scouts and actually seen Jackson himself, and stuff like that.
I wish that I believed in Fate. I wish I didn't sleep so late. I used to be carried in the arms of cheerleaders.
Reply
#50
<!--quoteo(post=43319:date=Jun 9 2009, 08:36 PM:name=KBwsb)-->QUOTE (KBwsb @ Jun 9 2009, 08:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Wasn't Tim Wheeler (who went to the Rox with the next pick) supposed to be a superior CF?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

The scouting report I just read mentioned he was good not great. He has no power though. I would really like to see the Cubs add power bats to their system, so if their plan is to bulk Jackson up, I don't mind the pick too much.
Reply
#51
<!--quoteo-->QUOTE <!--quotec-->Scouting Report: Brett Jackson, CF, Cal (2009 Draft)

Posted By John Klima on May 28, 2009

Brett Jackson, CF
Cal (2009 Draft)
6-2, 210
Bats: Left, Throws: Right
Games seen: 1, Innings 9

PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: Tall and medium build, athletic frame, strong upper half, flexibility increasing, still physically maturing. Strong forearms and grip, good hands. Athletic enough to stay in center field.

STRENGTHS: Strong hands and fast bat with aptitude for adjustment. Above-average arm in CF, fast first step, aggressive and smart base runner, fields what he gets to, comes in for the ball very well, should have average defensive range gap-to-gap as ML CF. Above-average speed, but not a burner.

WEAKNESSES: Bat has pop, but swing path might not generate above-average power in ML. Flat-footed defensively, can correct. Loosey-goosey game persona; can be a tough guy to get read of in game.

SUMMARY: Good body, good athlete. Bat should play enough to allow him to play every day. No one tool is a jaw dropper, but a very competitive overall package should make this player a major league regular.

GRADES:
Hit 45/60
Power 40/60
Arm 45/55
Field 45/50
Run 55/55

Overall Future Potential: 55<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Reply
#52
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wFGl1ETKkQk&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wFGl1ETKkQk&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YltNhuAhBB4&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YltNhuAhBB4&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
Reply
#53
So he doesn't hit for power, strikes out a lot and doesn't hit for average (.236ish in both conference play and the Cape Cod League). He is toolsy though!
[Image: 2hz4sk2.jpg]
Reply
#54
Sounds like he projects to be an average major leaguer at best. He certainly fits the bill as a #1 pick.
Reply
#55
BTW, I'm not really upset with the pick because it is a crapshoot, and who knows, either way he won't make a difference for a few years.
[Image: 2hz4sk2.jpg]
Reply
#56
How soon can we trade him?
Reply
#57
<!--quoteo(post=43335:date=Jun 9 2009, 09:57 PM:name=Butcher)-->QUOTE (Butcher @ Jun 9 2009, 09:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->How soon can we trade him?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I thought you wanted to trade for prospects.
This is not some silly theory that's unsupported and deserves being mocked by photos of Xena.  [Image: ITgoyeg.png]
Reply
#58
FWIW, this is supposed to be a poor draft all around for position players.
Reply
#59
<!--quoteo(post=43339:date=Jun 9 2009, 09:00 PM:name=ruby23)-->QUOTE (ruby23 @ Jun 9 2009, 09:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->FWIW, this is supposed to be a poor draft all around for position players.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Then we picked a super time to make CF our #1 priority.
Reply
#60
<!--quoteo(post=43337:date=Jun 9 2009, 08:59 PM:name=Kid)-->QUOTE (Kid @ Jun 9 2009, 08:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=43335:date=Jun 9 2009, 09:57 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Jun 9 2009, 09:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->How soon can we trade him?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I thought you wanted to trade for prospects.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'd gladly trade him for prospects.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 12 Guest(s)