Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Dunn vs. Bradley (so far)
#1
Adam Dunn -- .311/.475/.607/1.082
5 HR, 15 RBI
18 games, 80 plate appearances


Milton Bradley -- .042/.281/.167/.488
1 HR, 1 RBI
11 games, 32 plate appearances
Reply
#2
Good God.


...and that's not about the stats up there.
"I'm not sure I know what ball cheese or crotch rot is, exactly -- or if there is a difference between the two. Don't post photos, please..."

- Butcher
Reply
#3
Ibanez is the guy I really wish we had signed.
Reply
#4
<!--quoteo(post=33677:date=Apr 28 2009, 11:43 AM:name=Fella)-->QUOTE (Fella @ Apr 28 2009, 11:43 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Ibanez is the guy I really wish we had signed.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Ditto. But I would've been pretty happy with Dunn, too.
Reply
#5
if dunn is hitting anywhere near .311 at the end of the season, i'll eat ruby's shoe.

Wang.
Reply
#6
<!--quoteo(post=33681:date=Apr 28 2009, 12:39 PM:name=veryzer)-->QUOTE (veryzer @ Apr 28 2009, 12:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->if dunn is hitting anywhere near .311 at the end of the season, i'll eat ruby's shoe.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Who do you think is going to have the better season, though? Dunn or Bradley? I'll take Dunn without hesitation.
Reply
#7
its entirely possible dunn will suck less, i'll give you that.
Wang.
Reply
#8
<!--quoteo(post=33687:date=Apr 28 2009, 12:52 PM:name=veryzer)-->QUOTE (veryzer @ Apr 28 2009, 12:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->its entirely possible dunn will suck less, i'll give you that.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
And I'll take it.
Reply
#9
<!--quoteo(post=33683:date=Apr 28 2009, 12:42 PM:name=Butcher)-->QUOTE (Butcher @ Apr 28 2009, 12:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33681:date=Apr 28 2009, 12:39 PM:name=veryzer)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (veryzer @ Apr 28 2009, 12:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->if dunn is hitting anywhere near .311 at the end of the season, i'll eat ruby's shoe.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Who do you think is going to have the better season, though? Dunn or Bradley? I'll take Dunn without hesitation.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->


I never understood the Dunn haters myself. I mean, he may not be a cornerstone piece, but he's pretty fucking good, defensive issues not withstanding.
Reply
#10
For 1 year @ 5 million, Abreu would have been the best signing for this team.
Reply
#11
Dunn plays on an awful team, that no one cares about or goes to see, he has no pressure on him and is hitting well, seems like the perfect fit for a loser and a guy that doesn't give a shit about winning.

Had Dunn come to Wrigley, he'd be sucking ass right now, I'm positive of it. Also, it's not like he was a bargain either, he and Bradley are getting paid about the same. If my choices are Bradley or Dunn, it's Bradley every single time . . . now if we're talking Bradley or Abreu or Ibanez, it's a different story.
Reply
#12
fuck dunn. he blows.
Wang.
Reply
#13
Yeah, I wanted Ibanez the most. I don't even care about Dunn, as he was never a serious consideration for RF. Maybe we would have been happier with him right now, but by the end of the season anything can happen, assuming we even get into the postseason.
Reply
#14
I'm just beginning to think Bradley was a mistake of colossal proportions. If we were an AL team, then it might have been a good deal. Maybe.
Reply
#15
<!--quoteo(post=33706:date=Apr 28 2009, 01:51 PM:name=Butcher)-->QUOTE (Butcher @ Apr 28 2009, 01:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I'm just beginning to think Bradley was a mistake of colossal proportions. If we were an AL team, then it might have been a good deal. Maybe.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Just curious, would you be as mad if he had hit .320 in his games so far instead of .043?
@TheBlogfines
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)