Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bradley
Nady would be really nice provided that he is healthy now.
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=70779:date=Dec 5 2009, 11:34 AM:name=rok)-->QUOTE (rok @ Dec 5 2009, 11:34 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Nady would be really nice provided that he is healthy now.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I was thinking that as well. However, looking at his career numbers, the guy doesn't walk a whole lot.
Reply
I don't think I would be interested in any of those guys over Cameron. Especially if your just talking about a 1 year deal for everyone. Matsui didn't even play in the field this year did he? He isn't even an option for a National league team as far as I am concerned. I think he only played in the field a few times last season even.

Cameron 2009 .250 24HR .342obp .452slg .794ops

I would take those numbers from a centefielder for a one year deal. Especially when you add in his defense. In this market with the players available we could absoutley do much worse than Cameron on a one year deal. Hit him 6th or 7th and I have no problems.

Nady would be interesting if he was healthy. That's the problem with him though.
Reply
So. Who misses Felix Pie?
Cubs News and Rumors at Bleacher Nation.
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=70776:date=Dec 5 2009, 07:36 AM:name=Ace)-->QUOTE (Ace @ Dec 5 2009, 07:36 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=70764:date=Dec 4 2009, 11:39 PM:name=jstraw)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jstraw @ Dec 4 2009, 11:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Is it so critical that we move Fuk back to right that we don't look hard at right fielders?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I wonder that, too, straw. Yes, Fuk is outstanding in right field, but he was pretty ok in center field.

Anyone know what good right fielders are available and realistic (i.e., sadly, not Bay or Holliday)?


And yes, Sandberg, the ideal outcome would have been a productive Bradley. But Hendry already double-fucked that up.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
FMR...N/M
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=70784:date=Dec 5 2009, 10:25 AM:name=jstraw)-->QUOTE (jstraw @ Dec 5 2009, 10:25 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=70776:date=Dec 5 2009, 07:36 AM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Dec 5 2009, 07:36 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=70764:date=Dec 4 2009, 11:39 PM:name=jstraw)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jstraw @ Dec 4 2009, 11:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Is it so critical that we move Fuk back to right that we don't look hard at right fielders?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I wonder that, too, straw. Yes, Fuk is outstanding in right field, but he was pretty ok in center field.

Anyone know what good right fielders are available and realistic (i.e., sadly, not Bay or Holliday)?


And yes, Sandberg, the ideal outcome would have been a productive Bradley. But Hendry already double-fucked that up.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->


There is Butler...if the Royals don't look at him and think 'hey, we're only 24 players away from a championship caliber team.'
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

What is your infatuation with Butler? He has played exactly 6 games in LF...he has never played RF. He is a 1B. Unless you want Butler as a bench bat he has no value to the Cubs.
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=70787:date=Dec 5 2009, 10:31 AM:name=Runnys)-->QUOTE (Runnys @ Dec 5 2009, 10:31 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=70784:date=Dec 5 2009, 10:25 AM:name=jstraw)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jstraw @ Dec 5 2009, 10:25 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=70776:date=Dec 5 2009, 07:36 AM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Dec 5 2009, 07:36 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=70764:date=Dec 4 2009, 11:39 PM:name=jstraw)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jstraw @ Dec 4 2009, 11:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Is it so critical that we move Fuk back to right that we don't look hard at right fielders?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I wonder that, too, straw. Yes, Fuk is outstanding in right field, but he was pretty ok in center field.

Anyone know what good right fielders are available and realistic (i.e., sadly, not Bay or Holliday)?


And yes, Sandberg, the ideal outcome would have been a productive Bradley. But Hendry already double-fucked that up.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->


There is Butler...if the Royals don't look at him and think 'hey, we're only 24 players away from a championship caliber team.'
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

What is your infatuation with Butler? He has played exactly 6 games in LF...he has never played RF. He is a 1B. Unless you want Butler as a bench bat he has no value to the Cubs.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->


Ignorance, not infatuation. N/M

Alternately...I have the flu.
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=70783:date=Dec 5 2009, 10:16 AM:name=Ace)-->QUOTE (Ace @ Dec 5 2009, 10:16 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->So. Who misses Felix Pie?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Mmmm, sweet sweet Felix Pie. I would love him, actually.
Reply
Some twitter scuttlebutt going around that the Bradley/Castillo/Burrell three-way trade is going down soon. Looking for confirmation.
Cubs News and Rumors at Bleacher Nation.
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=70791:date=Dec 5 2009, 12:02 PM:name=Ace)-->QUOTE (Ace @ Dec 5 2009, 12:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->"Bradley/Castillo/Burrell three-way"<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Video or it didn't happen.
Reply
I don't want Cameron over anybody. I hate Bradley, but I'd rather keep him than go after Cameron. I'd sign Strap out of retirement first.
Wang.
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=70802:date=Dec 5 2009, 03:11 PM:name=veryzer)-->QUOTE (veryzer @ Dec 5 2009, 03:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I don't want Cameron over anybody. I hate Bradley, but I'd rather keep him than go after Cameron. I'd sign Strap out of retirement first.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

That's ... silly.
Cubs News and Rumors at Bleacher Nation.
Reply
Dude, Mike Cameron sucks. He really does. I may have exaggerated by bringing up Strap, but I don't exaggerate when I say Cameron sucks. He sucks. I could live with a 37 year old guy who hits .250 and strikeouts 150 times a year if he hit 40 home runs, drove in 100, and walked every once in a while, but this guy does none of those things. He's an average player at best with a decent glove on the down-side of his career. Fuck that shit.

Fuk is an average hitter in right and if Soriano has a similar year this year as he did last year, we could have the worst hitting outfield in the league. Again, fuck that shit.

I just got done reading Wittmeyer's article in the Sun Times. He says Cameron is the number one target and that there probably won't be any starting pitching added. What? Next year is going to be a bad bad bad year. The only positive I can come up with is that I won't have any expectations going in.
Wang.
Reply
2010 is going to be pretty brutal. My only hope is that the Cardinals regress a little and the Brewers/Astros/Reds/Pirates continue to suck.

I also don't see the point of fielding a mediocre team. I'd much rather do a firesale, play some youngsters (along with the mopes we can't get rid of), wait for some guys to develop, and then spend when the FA pool has more talent in it. We might actually have some money to spend at that point, too.
Reply
<!--quoteo(post=70804:date=Dec 5 2009, 03:35 PM:name=veryzer)-->QUOTE (veryzer @ Dec 5 2009, 03:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Dude, Mike Cameron sucks. He really does. I may have exaggerated by bringing up Strap, but I don't exaggerate when I say Cameron sucks. He sucks. I could live with a 37 year old guy who hits .250 and strikeouts 150 times a year if he hit 40 home runs, drove in 100, and walked every once in a while, but this guy does none of those things. He's an average player at best with a decent glove on the down-side of his career. Fuck that shit.

Fuk is an average hitter in right and if Soriano has a similar year this year as he did last year, we could have the worst hitting outfield in the league. Again, fuck that shit.

I just got done reading Wittmeyer's article in the Sun Times. He says Cameron is the number one target and that there probably won't be any starting pitching added. What? Next year is going to be a bad bad bad year. The only positive I can come up with is that I won't have any expectations going in.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Cameron on a one-year deal may be the best of a bunch of unpalatable options. It's Granderson or bust as far as I'm concerned, but if it's bust, it should be Cameron. He's a far better fit, and performer, than any of the other realistic options.

(assuming Bradley HAS to go)
Cubs News and Rumors at Bleacher Nation.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 16 Guest(s)