06-05-2010, 08:43 PM
<!--quoteo(post=100057:date=Jun 5 2010, 07:39 PM:name=rok)-->QUOTE (rok @ Jun 5 2010, 07:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=100053:date=Jun 5 2010, 07:08 PM:name=Rappster)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Rappster @ Jun 5 2010, 07:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=100051:date=Jun 5 2010, 06:23 PM:name=rok)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (rok @ Jun 5 2010, 06:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->The movie was above average, but it would have been just average if not for Bridges' performance. I especially liked how the father-son relationship and romantic sub-plots avoided the usual Hollywood feelgood conventions. I'd say this was a solid 3.5/5.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
You'd give Jesus a B+ for charisma.
Take a walk.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'd give the gnostic Jesus a solid A though for existentialism.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
You lost me...remember, I've got a "J" on my dog tags.
You'd give Jesus a B+ for charisma.
Take a walk.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'd give the gnostic Jesus a solid A though for existentialism.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
You lost me...remember, I've got a "J" on my dog tags.