06-01-2010, 07:47 PM
<!--quoteo(post=99376:date=Jun 1 2010, 05:31 PM:name=Scarey)-->QUOTE (Scarey @ Jun 1 2010, 05:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=99371:date=Jun 1 2010, 05:44 PM:name=Clapp)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Clapp @ Jun 1 2010, 05:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Wow...<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Would that lineup really look better with Lee and Ramirez in it?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I think Ramirez needs some time off and he's being an ass about everything. Benching Lee, Ramirez, and Soto all at the same time though... not sure how I really feel about that. Lee's had a history of having some bad slumps, and usually gets it back together soon.
I mean, they're all going to have to play, whether we like it or not. You just have to hope they get it back together, and you can't do that on the bench.
And of course Nady is now 2 for 2 with a 2-run bomb(but he'd been worse than Lee prior to that, so it's not like this was an obvious solution either).
Would that lineup really look better with Lee and Ramirez in it?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I think Ramirez needs some time off and he's being an ass about everything. Benching Lee, Ramirez, and Soto all at the same time though... not sure how I really feel about that. Lee's had a history of having some bad slumps, and usually gets it back together soon.
I mean, they're all going to have to play, whether we like it or not. You just have to hope they get it back together, and you can't do that on the bench.
And of course Nady is now 2 for 2 with a 2-run bomb(but he'd been worse than Lee prior to that, so it's not like this was an obvious solution either).
@TheBlogfines