05-28-2010, 01:00 PM
<!--quoteo(post=98792:date=May 28 2010, 11:27 AM:name=ColoradoCub)-->QUOTE (ColoradoCub @ May 28 2010, 11:27 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=98790:date=May 28 2010, 10:09 AM:name=veryzer)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (veryzer @ May 28 2010, 10:09 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=98778:date=May 28 2010, 09:28 AM:name=ColoradoCub)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ColoradoCub @ May 28 2010, 09:28 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=98770:date=May 28 2010, 07:57 AM:name=veryzer)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (veryzer @ May 28 2010, 07:57 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->is it possible that Zambrano may have agreed to waive his no-trade clause in exchange for being put back in the rotation?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Doesn't matter. He has little trade value.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I disagree.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Then you overvalue him. Stark or Rosenthal a month ago said that they had talked to several GMs that wouldn't have anything to do with him if he were available.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That's a negotiating position.
Doesn't matter. He has little trade value.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I disagree.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Then you overvalue him. Stark or Rosenthal a month ago said that they had talked to several GMs that wouldn't have anything to do with him if he were available.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That's a negotiating position.