Clutchness

[VanSlawAndCottoCheese]

<!--quoteo(post=98162:date=May 24 2010, 10:29 PM:name=jstraw)-->QUOTE (jstraw @ May 24 2010, 10:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=98160:date=May 24 2010, 09:23 PM:name=VanSlawAndCottoCheese)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (VanSlawAndCottoCheese @ May 24 2010, 09:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=98159:date=May 24 2010, 10:21 PM:name=jstraw)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jstraw @ May 24 2010, 10:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->It's not statistically his <i>turn</i> to swing a cold bat.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Argle-bargle.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yes, the idea of a statistical turn is gobbledegook. That's what I'm saying. Statistics are good. They're useful. You can determine when an event is statistically due, historically speaking but you sure as hell can't use statistics to predict events.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Oh, I get it now. You were saying that it's not that it's statistically his turn to swing his bat. Sorry, gotcha, I dig.