Grabow

[The Dude]

<!--quoteo(post=97656:date=May 21 2010, 10:07 AM:name=Scarey)-->QUOTE (Scarey @ May 21 2010, 10:07 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=97651:date=May 21 2010, 10:02 AM:name=Coach)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Coach @ May 21 2010, 10:02 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=97562:date=May 20 2010, 05:26 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ May 20 2010, 05:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=97556:date=May 20 2010, 04:15 PM:name=The Dude)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Dude @ May 20 2010, 04:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->ruby hasn't had much to say about the Grabow signing lately. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/ph34r.gif[/img]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
If he was used the way I wanted him to be used, it wouldn't be an issue. He's not a inning-long reliever and not a multiple inning reliever. He's not a loogy in the literal sense, but he should never face more than 3 batters. The role that Lou seems to think he's fit for is just plain wrong though.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
What role should have?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Yeah, I'm confused. He hasn't done well with inherited runners either, so I'm guess he shouldn't be a bail out guy like Marmol's been in the past. He should just come in the 7th or 8th for one or two outs?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

That's worth $3.75M per year, right?