Z to the Pen

[veryzer]

<!--quoteo(post=97035:date=May 19 2010, 02:19 PM:name=Rappster)-->QUOTE (Rappster @ May 19 2010, 02:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=96889:date=May 18 2010, 10:12 PM:name=BT)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BT @ May 18 2010, 10:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=96887:date=May 18 2010, 10:10 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ May 18 2010, 10:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Your points are good, BT, but most of us are coming from a place where we already believed the move was a massive fuck-up - the day it was made.

Thus, it's still a massive fuck-up because the move did not prove to be a success.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->


But to call every move the Cubs make that we dont' like and doesn't work out a massive fuckup basically makes the term "massive fuckup" meaningless.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Exactly...there seems to be an absolute desire to lose our collective minds over the unorthodox or inconsequential.

We're not flies on the wall...we don't know the inside story. Let people try things.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->


Unorthodox? For sure. Inconsequential? Not even close.