Z to the Pen

[BT]

<!--quoteo(post=96892:date=May 18 2010, 10:14 PM:name=funkster)-->QUOTE (funkster @ May 18 2010, 10:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=96889:date=May 18 2010, 10:12 PM:name=BT)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BT @ May 18 2010, 10:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=96887:date=May 18 2010, 10:10 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ May 18 2010, 10:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Your points are good, BT, but most of us are coming from a place where we already believed the move was a massive fuck-up - the day it was made.

Thus, it's still a massive fuck-up because the move did not prove to be a success.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->


But to call every move the Cubs make that we dont' like and doesn't work out a massive fuckup basically makes the term "massive fuckup" meaningless.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
If we're arguing about my exact choice of words, then we can use something else. We can use bad move.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->


I'm not making a argument based on semantics. I said from the beginning that people were overreacting. I feel they still are. You are not the only person I've heard describe the move as a massive fuckup.