05-13-2010, 01:50 AM
<!--quoteo(post=96074:date=May 12 2010, 06:23 PM:name=Ace)-->QUOTE (Ace @ May 12 2010, 06:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=96073:date=May 12 2010, 07:18 PM:name=Scarey)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Scarey @ May 12 2010, 07:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->It would be baffling if they convert Jackson to a reliever and call him up before Parker and Stevens. Stevens I understand a bit because he has chances last year. Especially considering Parker and Stevens are on the 40 man roster and Jackson isn't.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Good points. Thoughts on moving Jackson to the pen despite success as a starter?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
If they think that is how he would be most helpful to the team AND that he would be more helpful than others, I don't see a problem with it. I don't think he has anything else to prove in the minors really, so I see no problem with promoting him.. I just hope they aren't planning on t his being a permanent move which I'm 99% sure they aren't.
Good points. Thoughts on moving Jackson to the pen despite success as a starter?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
If they think that is how he would be most helpful to the team AND that he would be more helpful than others, I don't see a problem with it. I don't think he has anything else to prove in the minors really, so I see no problem with promoting him.. I just hope they aren't planning on t his being a permanent move which I'm 99% sure they aren't.