05-12-2010, 06:05 PM
<!--quoteo(post=96059:date=May 12 2010, 06:02 PM:name=Butcher)-->QUOTE (Butcher @ May 12 2010, 06:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=96056:date=May 12 2010, 04:53 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ May 12 2010, 04:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=96000:date=May 12 2010, 03:51 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ May 12 2010, 03:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Well, it's much earlier than June 22. So we're in better shape. In theory.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The concept of winning percentage would disagree.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
So you'd rather be 6 games under on June 22 than on May 12?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Of course not. But that's not what you said. Our current "shape" portends being far more than 6 games under .500 by June 22, 2010... because we're six (well, five) games under .500 already.
I'm breaking your balls.
The concept of winning percentage would disagree.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
So you'd rather be 6 games under on June 22 than on May 12?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Of course not. But that's not what you said. Our current "shape" portends being far more than 6 games under .500 by June 22, 2010... because we're six (well, five) games under .500 already.
I'm breaking your balls.
Cubs News and Rumors at Bleacher Nation.