05-04-2010, 04:49 PM
<!--quoteo(post=94702:date=May 4 2010, 03:34 PM:name=BT)-->QUOTE (BT @ May 4 2010, 03:34 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=94642:date=May 4 2010, 01:43 PM:name=Rappster)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Rappster @ May 4 2010, 01:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->The moment he decided to run on the field...he lost the argument. He gets no say in what a policeman decides to do to stop him...
Taze him.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
You realize the ramifications of this argument, right?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I do...and it has limits. But...if I'm the on the jury (knowing only what I'm seeing right now), the taser stands up.
A gun does not. A beating does not.
A taser to subdue recklessness does...
Taze him.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
You realize the ramifications of this argument, right?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I do...and it has limits. But...if I'm the on the jury (knowing only what I'm seeing right now), the taser stands up.
A gun does not. A beating does not.
A taser to subdue recklessness does...