Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
For the sake of argument...
#23
<!--quoteo(post=93765:date=Apr 30 2010, 11:01 AM:name=VanSlawAndCottoCheese)-->QUOTE (VanSlawAndCottoCheese @ Apr 30 2010, 11:01 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=93751:date=Apr 30 2010, 10:54 AM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Apr 30 2010, 10:54 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Because 1st base is the easiest position to find an adequate replacement at in baseball, SS is the most difficult. It would take Castro and probably 2-3 more top prospects to get Gonzalez. Gonzalez would then need to be signed to a Soriano-type extension after the season. It's just not a winning situation for the Cubs, IMO.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Isn't Castro's ultimate position rumored to be 2B with--in an ideal world--with Lee at SS? And how are our other Middle IF prospects (Watkins, Falherty, LeMahieu) doing this spring? I'm not necessarily saying I'd do the deal, but 2B and SS are supposed strengths in our farm.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
When Lee's ready, then Castro can go to 2B and Theriot can go out to pasture.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
For the sake of argument... - by Coldneck - 04-30-2010, 08:25 AM
For the sake of argument... - by Coldneck - 04-30-2010, 08:26 AM
For the sake of argument... - by ruby23 - 04-30-2010, 08:57 AM
For the sake of argument... - by ruby23 - 04-30-2010, 08:57 AM
For the sake of argument... - by Coldneck - 04-30-2010, 09:01 AM
For the sake of argument... - by jstraw - 04-30-2010, 09:03 AM
For the sake of argument... - by Scarey - 04-30-2010, 09:10 AM
For the sake of argument... - by Coldneck - 04-30-2010, 09:14 AM
For the sake of argument... - by Scarey - 04-30-2010, 09:26 AM
For the sake of argument... - by Coach - 04-30-2010, 10:15 AM
For the sake of argument... - by jstraw - 04-30-2010, 10:18 AM
For the sake of argument... - by Runnys - 04-30-2010, 10:35 AM
For the sake of argument... - by Runnys - 04-30-2010, 10:36 AM
For the sake of argument... - by ruby23 - 04-30-2010, 10:52 AM
For the sake of argument... - by ruby23 - 04-30-2010, 10:54 AM
For the sake of argument... - by Coach - 04-30-2010, 10:59 AM
For the sake of argument... - by jstraw - 04-30-2010, 11:13 AM
For the sake of argument... - by Rappster - 04-30-2010, 11:39 AM
For the sake of argument... - by Coldneck - 04-30-2010, 11:55 AM
For the sake of argument... - by jstraw - 04-30-2010, 12:03 PM
For the sake of argument... - by ruby23 - 04-30-2010, 12:12 PM
For the sake of argument... - by ruby23 - 04-30-2010, 12:14 PM
For the sake of argument... - by Coldneck - 04-30-2010, 12:15 PM
For the sake of argument... - by ruby23 - 04-30-2010, 12:16 PM
For the sake of argument... - by bz - 04-30-2010, 12:42 PM
For the sake of argument... - by bz - 04-30-2010, 12:50 PM
For the sake of argument... - by Scarey - 04-30-2010, 12:53 PM
For the sake of argument... - by Coldneck - 04-30-2010, 01:06 PM
For the sake of argument... - by ruby23 - 04-30-2010, 01:10 PM
For the sake of argument... - by kbwsb - 04-30-2010, 01:14 PM
For the sake of argument... - by Scarey - 04-30-2010, 01:27 PM
For the sake of argument... - by kbwsb - 04-30-2010, 01:33 PM
For the sake of argument... - by Scarey - 04-30-2010, 01:35 PM
For the sake of argument... - by Coldneck - 04-30-2010, 01:42 PM
For the sake of argument... - by bz - 04-30-2010, 03:15 PM
For the sake of argument... - by CountRushmore - 04-30-2010, 03:23 PM
For the sake of argument... - by ruby23 - 04-30-2010, 03:47 PM
For the sake of argument... - by Destined - 04-30-2010, 03:51 PM
For the sake of argument... - by kbwsb - 04-30-2010, 03:54 PM
For the sake of argument... - by biggz - 04-30-2010, 04:11 PM
For the sake of argument... - by jstraw - 04-30-2010, 05:10 PM
For the sake of argument... - by veryzer - 04-30-2010, 09:33 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)