04-12-2010, 11:00 AM
<!--quoteo(post=88262:date=Apr 12 2010, 08:26 AM:name=BT)-->QUOTE (BT @ Apr 12 2010, 08:26 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->The Cubs could NOT sign Grabow for less. They could either offer him arbitration or let him go. If they offered him arbitration, they would be paying him more money in 2010 than they are paying him now. That's almost inarguable.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Like I said in a previous post. Coldneck was wrong about Grabow still being an arbitration guy. He was not. He was a free agent. Its very possible that the cubs could have waited a couple months and signed him for less.
And the only reason I would care about that is so there would have been money to sign/trade for someone else.
Like I said in a previous post. Coldneck was wrong about Grabow still being an arbitration guy. He was not. He was a free agent. Its very possible that the cubs could have waited a couple months and signed him for less.
And the only reason I would care about that is so there would have been money to sign/trade for someone else.