03-29-2010, 05:49 AM
<!--quoteo(post=84927:date=Mar 28 2010, 05:40 PM:name=KBwsb)-->QUOTE (KBwsb @ Mar 28 2010, 05:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=84922:date=Mar 28 2010, 05:08 PM:name=Coach)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Coach @ Mar 28 2010, 05:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->If Bradley hits, then we dont have the attitude problems.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I think that's accurate. Slow start equals problems.
OTOH, Bradley's 2nd half numbers compare favorably to Byrd's season, last year:
Bradley.273/.377/.415
Byrd .283/.329/.479
Considering one guy is cool, and the other guy is a prick, I suppose the Cubs are better off, although that is a vast difference in OPB. (nearly 50 points). At least Byrd showed more power.
Interesting stat that I did not know: last year, Bradley hit MUCH better at Wrigley than he did on the road. How does that make sense?
Home .296 /.407 /.485 (OPS.892) those are all-star numbers
Road .214/.347/.299 (OPS.646) those numbers suck dick
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Very telling stats considering he hated playing at Wrigley
I think that's accurate. Slow start equals problems.
OTOH, Bradley's 2nd half numbers compare favorably to Byrd's season, last year:
Bradley.273/.377/.415
Byrd .283/.329/.479
Considering one guy is cool, and the other guy is a prick, I suppose the Cubs are better off, although that is a vast difference in OPB. (nearly 50 points). At least Byrd showed more power.
Interesting stat that I did not know: last year, Bradley hit MUCH better at Wrigley than he did on the road. How does that make sense?
Home .296 /.407 /.485 (OPS.892) those are all-star numbers
Road .214/.347/.299 (OPS.646) those numbers suck dick
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Very telling stats considering he hated playing at Wrigley