03-18-2010, 10:49 AM
<!--quoteo(post=83181:date=Mar 18 2010, 09:41 AM:name=jstraw)-->QUOTE (jstraw @ Mar 18 2010, 09:41 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->My problem with this is that it's not a jumbotron and it sounds like a long-term agreement. I'd prefer Toyota be the primary, anchor sponsor <i>OF</i> a jumbotron. This could lock that out for years...a big-ass logo is not preferable to something with a functional purpose, in my view.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Well, what is to say that the agreement could't be expanded at some point to install a screen on that very spot? No reason why they can't renegotiate down the road when the landmark committee douchebags give the ok.
Well, what is to say that the agreement could't be expanded at some point to install a screen on that very spot? No reason why they can't renegotiate down the road when the landmark committee douchebags give the ok.