03-17-2010, 01:20 PM
<!--quoteo(post=83059:date=Mar 17 2010, 12:10 PM:name=The Dude)-->QUOTE (The Dude @ Mar 17 2010, 12:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=83051:date=Mar 17 2010, 11:20 AM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Mar 17 2010, 11:20 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Put the sign on the casino rooftop.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
This is what I've always said. Everyone wins.
And they don't want to mess with the rooftops because they now get millions in renevue from them.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Well, it's what I said back in November when the temporary sign went up.
As for the revenue from the rooftops, how important that is, is the Ricketts' decision. If they think the club's interests are better served with a jumbotron, they can forgo the rooftop revenue and fuck the building owners.
But yes, I still think a jumbotron where the horseshoe is is a win, win, win. Win for Wrigley, win for the rooftop people, win for the owners of the building with the horseshoe ad. I'm sure the two sides would have a time of it, agreeing on a price.
This is what I've always said. Everyone wins.
And they don't want to mess with the rooftops because they now get millions in renevue from them.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Well, it's what I said back in November when the temporary sign went up.
As for the revenue from the rooftops, how important that is, is the Ricketts' decision. If they think the club's interests are better served with a jumbotron, they can forgo the rooftop revenue and fuck the building owners.
But yes, I still think a jumbotron where the horseshoe is is a win, win, win. Win for Wrigley, win for the rooftop people, win for the owners of the building with the horseshoe ad. I'm sure the two sides would have a time of it, agreeing on a price.