03-17-2010, 12:06 PM
<!--quoteo(post=83044:date=Mar 17 2010, 11:00 AM:name=Coach)-->QUOTE (Coach @ Mar 17 2010, 11:00 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=83043:date=Mar 17 2010, 11:50 AM:name=rok)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (rok @ Mar 17 2010, 11:50 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=83040:date=Mar 17 2010, 09:59 AM:name=Coach)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Coach @ Mar 17 2010, 09:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Why are we on the Historical Landmark thing?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I believe the scoreboard, marquee and the outfield walls are landmarked. All else is up for interpretation.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Didn't this happen as a way to get state funds to help renovate some areas?
Did we ask for this declaration?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
http://cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=2...sp&c_id=chc
It happened in 2004, and the team did not support or ask for landmark status. I believe the process was initiated by the neighborhood to prevent expansion of parts of the ballpark and protect area interests.
I believe the scoreboard, marquee and the outfield walls are landmarked. All else is up for interpretation.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Didn't this happen as a way to get state funds to help renovate some areas?
Did we ask for this declaration?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
http://cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=2...sp&c_id=chc
It happened in 2004, and the team did not support or ask for landmark status. I believe the process was initiated by the neighborhood to prevent expansion of parts of the ballpark and protect area interests.