The Pacific

[funkster]

<!--quoteo(post=82959:date=Mar 16 2010, 04:30 PM:name=Butcher)-->QUOTE (Butcher @ Mar 16 2010, 04:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=82954:date=Mar 16 2010, 04:26 PM:name=jstraw)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jstraw @ Mar 16 2010, 04:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=82952:date=Mar 16 2010, 04:23 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Mar 16 2010, 04:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=82950:date=Mar 16 2010, 04:21 PM:name=jstraw)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jstraw @ Mar 16 2010, 04:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=82944:date=Mar 16 2010, 04:04 PM:name=funkster)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (funkster @ Mar 16 2010, 04:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->So now you're claiming Scorsese shouldn't have done Casino? That's preposterous. Just because the two movies are about the mafia, and are done in the same "style" doesn't mean he shouldn't have done the movie. Casino is a great film, not the masterpiece that goodfellas is, but still one of my favorite movies and extremely well made and acted. If the only films that entertain you are "completely original" material, then I feel sorry that you rarely are entertained.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I think Scorsese's incredibly overrated post "King Of Comedy." "Goodfellas," "Gangs of New York" and "The Departed" were decent." "Casino" wasn't bad but it was more of the same, and Joe Pesce is just awful. Once was enough.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Holy fuck.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

We don't all like the same things but only a retard thinks Joe Pesce can act.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Pesci.

And you're nuts. Pesci might be a one-trick pony (that's as far as I'm willing to go), but he's fucking awesome at that one trick.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yup. If he's a shitty actor, then his three outliers were Raging Bull, Goodfellas, and Casino.