03-12-2010, 06:47 PM
<!--quoteo(post=82492:date=Mar 12 2010, 12:50 PM:name=leonardsipes)-->QUOTE (leonardsipes @ Mar 12 2010, 12:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <!--quotec-->You see, when Hendry chose to sign Milton Bradley over Raul Ibanez, Adam Dunn and Bobby Abreu - all of whom had successful 2009 seasons - he did so knowing full well that Bradley had been with five teams in six seasons, had a reputation of being a distraction and terrible teammate, and had an inherent risk of self-destruction<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The Cubs needed a run producer to hit 5th. Abreu or Ibanez (I will give Hendry that he could not know, Dunn would end up in his price range) were better choices. There were many reasons. Bradley could have a blow up, he could be injured, he could be a bad club house influence, he never has been a great run producer and last and least he could have his worse OPS in 8 years.
Hendry is playing it off like "oh yeah, I made a mistake, I never expected him to OPS .775."
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
LENNY! I've always loved you.
The Cubs needed a run producer to hit 5th. Abreu or Ibanez (I will give Hendry that he could not know, Dunn would end up in his price range) were better choices. There were many reasons. Bradley could have a blow up, he could be injured, he could be a bad club house influence, he never has been a great run producer and last and least he could have his worse OPS in 8 years.
Hendry is playing it off like "oh yeah, I made a mistake, I never expected him to OPS .775."
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
LENNY! I've always loved you.
Cubs News and Rumors at Bleacher Nation.