03-12-2010, 12:19 AM
<!--quoteo(post=82450:date=Mar 11 2010, 08:24 PM:name=Ace)-->QUOTE (Ace @ Mar 11 2010, 08:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=82449:date=Mar 11 2010, 09:20 PM:name=AnnoCatuli)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (AnnoCatuli @ Mar 11 2010, 09:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->isnt that basically what Hendry said?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
No. He added - twice - that Bradley came the Cubs and did not perform. Hendry went so far as to say the "only problem" with Bradley was the "lack of performance."
I mean, what the hell is that? Totally unnecessary to be said.
But there's a reason he said it.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
He's stupid enough to sign Bradley and smart enough to have some Machiavellian reason for a comment to a reporter?
No. He added - twice - that Bradley came the Cubs and did not perform. Hendry went so far as to say the "only problem" with Bradley was the "lack of performance."
I mean, what the hell is that? Totally unnecessary to be said.
But there's a reason he said it.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
He's stupid enough to sign Bradley and smart enough to have some Machiavellian reason for a comment to a reporter?