Bradley traded??

[Ace]

<!--quoteo(post=82413:date=Mar 11 2010, 08:17 PM:name=bz)-->QUOTE (bz @ Mar 11 2010, 08:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Everyone knew it was a gamble to sign him. But the gamble was that he'd play 130 games, and that would appease his dickishness. No one expected him to be relatively healthy and not perform. No one calculated that as part of the risk.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

So yes or no: you're saying the primary reason the Cubs had to dump him was because he "didn't perform"?

EDIT: I get what you're really saying. You're saying it was both douchiness and performance. But I'm saying Hendry's quotes - all of them - only focus on performance. And that's wildly, wildly misleading.