03-02-2010, 02:24 PM
<!--quoteo(post=81168:date=Mar 2 2010, 11:30 AM:name=BT)-->QUOTE (BT @ Mar 2 2010, 11:30 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=81137:date=Mar 1 2010, 08:46 PM:name=AnnoCatuli)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (AnnoCatuli @ Mar 1 2010, 08:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=81113:date=Mar 1 2010, 02:27 PM:name=rok)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (rok @ Mar 1 2010, 02:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=81112:date=Mar 1 2010, 02:23 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Mar 1 2010, 02:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I actually think the Score is better to listen to now than it used to be (they seem to behating every Chicago team almost equally). Could just be me though.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The Score Overnight show is actually reallly good, and 1/2 of Mully and Hanley isn't bad, but overall they still don't treat both teams fairly throughout the rest of the day.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I disagree. The shows are evenly split
Mulley and Hanley one Cub fan, one Sox fan
Danny Mac and Mat, one Cub fan one Sox fan
B&B, both Sox fans, but they dont sit there and bash the Cubs all the time.
I love hearing people be critical on the team. Maybe not overly so, but I dont want someone who is going to kiss the teams ass and go on and on about how great player X is doing when he is 0-5 with 3 errors (made up player). If someone sucks, I have no problem with them being called out.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
You are making some fundamental mistakes here.
Mulley, optimistic Sox fan, Hanley, pessimistic Cub fan. One praises the Sox, the other rips the Cubs. More often than not, Mulley is the voice of reason when discussing the Cubs.
Can't listen to mac and mat as I'm at work
B&B bash pretty much everyone, but they have a much different standard when bashing the Cubs. If any Cub fan talked about a Cub prospect the way that B&B talk about Beckham (just yesterday, Boers was explaining how Beckham will contribute "almost" as much offense as Adrian Gonzalez over the next few years), they would be laughed off the air by B&B
I don't want a homer either, but listening the other day to a bunch of guys laughing at the mere mention of Julio Zuleta, as though just his existence as a former Cub is good enough for a punchline, was depressing as all get out.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I got quite a good laugh out of them talking up their farm system. Holmes kept coming back to how Beckham would have to be included in a Gonzalez trade but Boers was trying to rationalize just trading other guys. Boers actually thought Daniel Hudson and Jordan Danks was enough to get Gonzalez.
The Score Overnight show is actually reallly good, and 1/2 of Mully and Hanley isn't bad, but overall they still don't treat both teams fairly throughout the rest of the day.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I disagree. The shows are evenly split
Mulley and Hanley one Cub fan, one Sox fan
Danny Mac and Mat, one Cub fan one Sox fan
B&B, both Sox fans, but they dont sit there and bash the Cubs all the time.
I love hearing people be critical on the team. Maybe not overly so, but I dont want someone who is going to kiss the teams ass and go on and on about how great player X is doing when he is 0-5 with 3 errors (made up player). If someone sucks, I have no problem with them being called out.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
You are making some fundamental mistakes here.
Mulley, optimistic Sox fan, Hanley, pessimistic Cub fan. One praises the Sox, the other rips the Cubs. More often than not, Mulley is the voice of reason when discussing the Cubs.
Can't listen to mac and mat as I'm at work
B&B bash pretty much everyone, but they have a much different standard when bashing the Cubs. If any Cub fan talked about a Cub prospect the way that B&B talk about Beckham (just yesterday, Boers was explaining how Beckham will contribute "almost" as much offense as Adrian Gonzalez over the next few years), they would be laughed off the air by B&B
I don't want a homer either, but listening the other day to a bunch of guys laughing at the mere mention of Julio Zuleta, as though just his existence as a former Cub is good enough for a punchline, was depressing as all get out.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I got quite a good laugh out of them talking up their farm system. Holmes kept coming back to how Beckham would have to be included in a Gonzalez trade but Boers was trying to rationalize just trading other guys. Boers actually thought Daniel Hudson and Jordan Danks was enough to get Gonzalez.