03-02-2010, 10:53 AM
<!--quoteo(post=81160:date=Mar 2 2010, 08:10 AM:name=Coldneck)-->QUOTE (Coldneck @ Mar 2 2010, 08:10 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=81151:date=Mar 2 2010, 07:46 AM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Mar 2 2010, 07:46 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Nothing can tell you what IS going to happen in the future; but stats, contextualized as PCB said, can tell you what is more likely than not to happen in the future.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
This. Stats are far more reliable at predicting the future than a scout's eye.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I would agree with this in most cases but not all. You still need scouts to help make sense of stats, and factor in other qualitative info that never shows up on stat sheets.
This. Stats are far more reliable at predicting the future than a scout's eye.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I would agree with this in most cases but not all. You still need scouts to help make sense of stats, and factor in other qualitative info that never shows up on stat sheets.